Wirtschaft (MSB)
Refine
Year
- 2018 (145) (remove)
Publication Type
- Report (50)
- Lecture (37)
- Article (18)
- Book (14)
- Part of a Book (13)
- Conference Proceeding (12)
- Contribution to a Periodical (1)
Language
- English (101)
- German (36)
- Multiple languages (7)
- French (1)
Keywords
- Networking (2)
- University-Business Cooperation (2)
- Academic Entrepreneurship (1)
- Arbeitszeitmanagement (1)
- Blockchain (1)
- Cloud (1)
- Controlling (1)
- Digital Lean (1)
- Digitale Transformation Digitalisierung (1)
- Entrepreneurial behaviour (1)
- Ethereum (1)
- Firmware Update (1)
- Higher Education (1)
- Internet der Dinge (1)
- IoT (1)
- Personalentwicklung (1)
- Personalführung (1)
- Personalmanagement (1)
- Skills orientation (1)
- Social Capital (1)
- Supply network mapping (1)
- curriculum development (1)
- digitalisation (1)
- engaged university (1)
- entrepreneurial university (1)
- future university (1)
- skills profiles (1)
- strategisches Personalmanagement (1)
Faculty
Investitionscontrolling
(2018)
Focal companies are embedded in complex supply networks consisting of various suppliers, customers, competitors and complementors. The activities of these actors influence the com-petitive position of the focal companies. Some customers achieve preferred customer status and gain preferential treatment, others have to restrain to being standard customers getting less privileged services. Consequently, buying companies in such markets have to achieve transparency about the relationships of their suppliers towards their competitors and comple-mentors in order to map them and to analyse their impact. Current literature lacks a holistic approach to capture these relationships. In which sources can the focal companies find the desired information? Which kind of information do they really need? And in which situations is the need for transparency high and when is it low? The aim of this research is to examine these relationships using a World Café method with purchasers for data gathering followed by a Gioia method to structure the qualitative data. The result is a list of desired knowledge cov-ering business, supplier and collaboration details; a set of information sources clustered in pub-lished and unpublished sources as well as contingency factors regarding general conditions, changes and particular occasions that require a high supplier relationship knowledge. All an-swers have been rated by their importance during the World Café. The answers can help to operationalise the mapping of supplier relationships towards competitors and complementors in order to assess the own customer status compared to other customers.
Methoden zur Überwachung und Steuerung von Materialflüssen in einem Produktions- oder Logistiksystem sollen Ziele wie niedrige Kosten und kurze Durchlaufzeiten unterstützen. Die Steuerungsprinzipien der Lean Production zielen auf dezentrale, bedarfsorientierte Selbstorganisation der Prozesse, zum Beispiel in einem Kanban-Regelkreis. Die Ansätze der Industrie 4.0 setzen auf digitale Vernetzung von Maschinen, Produkten und Mitarbeitern sowie den Einsatz von Sensorik. Welcher Steuerungsansatz passt zu welchem Produktportfolio? Lassen sich die Ansätze kombinieren – schlank durch Digitalisierung? Das Crossroads-Modell erklärt anschaulich die Unterschiede der Steuerungsansätze und leitet konkrete Handlungsempfehlungen für die Unternehmenspraxis ab.
Globalization, digitalization and increasingly shortened lifecycles of consumer and business goods require companies to be continuously innovative. Under these domains of innovation, disruptive innovation has developed as a popular term amongst scholars and practitioners alike (Christensen, Raynor, & McDonald, 2015). In fact, the concept of disruptive technolo-gies was introduced to explain the failure of incumbent businesses in times of change (Bower & Christensen, 1995). Later, research broadened the concept towards disruptive innovations thereby going beyond technologies alone (Yu & Hang, 2010). Indeed, recent literature stresses the embracing business model that needs to be designed appropriately to make use of the technology and push it forward in the process of disruption. Subse-quently, current research concludes that disruption in its core is a “business model problem, not a technology problem” (Christensen, 2006).
Despite the recognition of the relevance of a firm’s business model for disruption, a clarifi-cation of the business model concept in the disruptive innovation process appears to be necessary in two dimensions. First, there is only limited knowledge regarding the actual design of (potential) disruptive business models. Second, from a dynamic perspective, less is known about how organizations manage the process of disruptive innovation until their business model yields a disruptive effect in the market.
The PhD research project aims at shedding light on the role of the firm’s business model in regard to the concept of disruptive innovation. Insights from this research project will not only add to a deeper understanding of disruptive innovation from a theoretical perspective but also deliver guidance for managers facing an increasingly changing environment.
Disruption, Machine Learning, Internet of Things, Augmented Reality, Industry 4.0 and Rapid Prototyping are just a selection of the buzzwords that come up in connection with the rapid changes in the professional world and society brought about by digitalisation. As frequently occurs when buzzwords are used, their exact meaning is unknown, or remains unquestioned, but the use of them is nevertheless excessive. In this way, the buzzword ‘digital native’ assumes that an entire generation has a command of digital skills simply because they were born into this world and use digital media naturally. Which skills profiles this generation, and therefore a majority of today’s students, actually command, remains vague however, and is rarely explored systematically. The same is true of the specific formulation of necessary skills profiles in the digital world for higher education graduates. In the debate around higher education institutions, the description of the swift digital transition (with or without buzzwords) is not usually followed by a revision of existing curricula. This article describes strategic considerations for a better fit between the skills demanded of students and the challenges of the digital world.
Personalmanagement
(2018)
Virtual reality (VR) is starting to realize some of its promise as a tool to improve training effectiveness. However, research on VR for training and development is limited. Existing theories and models relating to organizational training and learning are infrequently used in the VR literature. A greater understanding of why VR works in the training context would help training designers create effective programs that leverage this continuously developing technology. This paper provides a typology of VR technologies specifically relevant to HR and integrates HR training frameworks and theory into findings on VR training from these other literatures. We specifically focus on immersive VR technology and seek to better understand reasons for the effectiveness of VR technologies for both training and assessment. We review findings, integrate related streams of research, and offer guideposts for those contemplating VR implementation in four important areas: training reactions in a VR context, VR-specific learning outcomes, opportunities for assessment using VR, and the effect of VR on training transfer. We conclude the paper by identifying a VR-training agenda for HR researchers.