• Deutsch
Internal Login

Open Access

  • Home
  • Search
  • Browse
  • Publish
  • FAQ
  • Institutes

Gesundheit (MDH)

  • Gesundheit (7) subscribe to RSS feed

Refine

Author

  • Knecht, Christiane (20)
  • Prescher, Thomas (17)
  • Kernebeck, Sven (14)
  • Nienaber, André (14)
  • Busse, Theresa Sophie (12)
  • Ehlers, Jan Peter (9)
  • Jux, Chantal (8)
  • Oetting-Roß, Claudia (7)
  • Meyer, Dorothee (6)
  • Sellemann, Björn (6)
+ more

Year of publication

  • 2021 (98) (remove)

Document Type

  • Article (49)
  • Lecture (24)
  • Contribution in a (non-scientific) periodical oder newspaper (10)
  • Part of a Book (8)
  • Article in Conference Proceedings (5)
  • Bachelor Thesis (1)
  • Book (1)

Language

  • German (78)
  • English (20)

Has Fulltext

  • no (86)
  • yes (12)

Is part of the Bibliography

  • no (98)

Keywords

  • Acetic Acid (1)
  • COVID-19 (1)
  • Decontamination (1)
  • FFP (1)
  • Hydrogen peroxide (1)
  • Oberflächen-Elektromyographie (1)
  • Schluckmanöver (1)

Institute

  • Gesundheit (MDH) (98)
  • Physikingenieurwesen (PHY) (1)

98 search hits

  • 1 to 10
  • BibTeX
  • CSV
  • RIS
  • 10
  • 20
  • 50
  • 100

Sort by

  • Year
  • Year
  • Title
  • Title
  • Author
  • Author
»Für uns hat niemand geklatscht.« Die Situation der Pflegenden und Pflegebedürftigen in den Gemeinden. Veranstaltungsreihe der Ev. Fachstelle für Seelsorge im Alter und für Quartiersentwicklung, 19.01.2021 (digital) (2021)
Knecht, Christiane
Zeit für eine Zwischenbilanz: Zehn Jahre Studiengang Psychische Gesundheit/Psychiatrische Pflege (2021)
Rixe, Jacqueline ; Nienaber, André ; Löhr, Michael ; Schulz, Michael
Vorbilder in der Ausbildung zum Notfallsanitäter: Eine Fragebogenstudie (2021)
Winterstein, Ingo ; Prescher, Thomas
Vom Schattendasein zur Bewältigungsarbeit (2021)
Knecht, Christiane
Views on Using Social Robots in Professional Caregiving: Content Analysis of a Scenario Method Workshop (Preprint) (2021)
Busse, Theresa Sophie ; Kernebeck, Sven ; Nef, Larissa ; Rebacz, Patrick ; Kickbusch, Ilona ; Ehlers, Jan Peter
BACKGROUND Interest in digital technologies in the health care sector is growing and can be a way to reduce the burden on professional caregivers while helping people to become more independent. Social robots are regarded as a special form of technology that can be usefully applied in professional caregiving with the potential to focus on interpersonal contact. While implementation is progressing slowly, a debate on the concepts and applications of social robots in future care is necessary. OBJECTIVE In addition to existing studies with a focus on societal attitudes toward social robots, there is a need to understand the views of professional caregivers and patients. This study used desired future scenarios to collate the perspectives of experts and analyze the significance for developing the place of social robots in care. METHODS In February 2020, an expert workshop was held with 88 participants (health professionals and educators; [PhD] students of medicine, health care, professional care, and technology; patient advocates; software developers; government representatives; and research fellows) from Austria, Germany, and Switzerland. Using the scenario methodology, the possibilities of analog professional care (Analog Care), fully robotic professional care (Robotic Care), teams of robots and professional caregivers (Deep Care), and professional caregivers supported by robots (Smart Care) were discussed. The scenarios were used as a stimulus for the development of ideas about future professional caregiving. The discussion was evaluated using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS The majority of the experts were in favor of care in which people are supported by technology (Deep Care) and developed similar scenarios with a focus on dignity-centeredness. The discussions then focused on the steps necessary for its implementation, highlighting a strong need for the development of eHealth competence in society, a change in the training of professional caregivers, and cross-sectoral concepts. The experts also saw user acceptance as crucial to the use of robotics. This involves the acceptance of both professional caregivers and care recipients. CONCLUSIONS The literature review and subsequent workshop revealed how decision-making about the value of social robots depends on personal characteristics related to experience and values. There is therefore a strong need to recognize individual perspectives of care before social robots become an integrated part of care in the future.
Unterschätztes Handlungsfeld - Physiotherapeuten als Experten für Bewegung bei psychischen Erkrankungen (2021)
Stickdorn, I. ; Grafe, M.
Tröstende Sorgekultur in Zeiten der Pandemie. Würdezentrierte Beziehungsgestaltung wider moralische Verletzbarkeit (2021)
Schwermann, Meike
Strengthening the Family in the Management of Chronic Disease. 2nd International 3rd National Congress on Public Health Nursing, 08.01.2021 (digital) (2021)
Knecht, Christiane
Steigerung der Versorgungsqualität in der Palliativversorgung durch elektronische Gesundheitsakten (2021)
Busse, Theresa Sophie ; Jux, Chantal ; Kernebeck, Sven ; Meister, Sven ; Ehlers, Jan P.
Soziale Ungleichheit in der häuslichen Versorgung pflegebedürftiger Menschen aus der Perspektive von Pflegefachkräften. Hochschultag der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Pflegewissenschaft (2021)
Noelle, Marco ; Büscher, Andreas ; Oetting-Roß, Claudia
  • 1 to 10

OPUS4 Logo

  • Contact
  • Imprint
  • Sitelinks