Physikingenieurwesen (PHY)
Refine
Year
Publication Type
- Conference Proceeding (160) (remove)
Keywords
- adaptive optics (3)
- deformable mirror (3)
- active optics (2)
- active optics, adaptive optics, sharpness metrics, aberration compensation, algorithm design (2)
- space telescopes (2)
- CMS (1)
- Deformable mirror, adaptive mirror, unimorph mirror, high-power laser (1)
- V&V 40 (1)
- computational modeling and simulation (1)
- model credibility (1)
- space optics (1)
- space qualification (1)
- unimorph (1)
- validation (1)
- vibration damping (1)
Faculty
- Physikingenieurwesen (PHY) (160)
- Gesundheit (MDH) (1)
Additive manufacturing (AM) has been growing continuously over the past 20 years, enabling unprecedented tailoring to the anatomy of each patient. In Europe, custom-made devices qualify for an exemption and pass a simplified approval process. New technologies, like AM, provoke questions about the adequacy of the current regulatory framework for custom-made devices. This article addresses the regulatory requirements for such devices in Europe and discusses the implications for AM. It concludes that the legal framework for custom-made devices entails uncertainties which need to be resolved to guide manufacturers through the regulatory requirements, highlighting the specific areas of focus for AM.
The use of computational modeling and simulation (CMS) as a tool for gaining insight into the technical performance and safety of medical devices has emerged continuously over the past years. However, to rely on information and decisions derived from model predictions, it is essential to establish model credibility for the specific context of use. Limited regulatory requirements and lack of consensus on the level of verification and validation activities required result in rare use of CMS as a source of evidence in the medical device approval process. The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) developed a risk-informed framework to establish appropriate credibility requirements of a computational model: the ASME V&V 40?2018 standard. This paper aims to outline the concepts of this standard and to demonstrate its application using an example from the orthotics field. The necessary steps to establish model credibility for a custom?made 3D printed wrist hand orthosis (WHO) are presented. It is shown that the credibility requirements of each verification and validation activity depend on model risk by applying two different contexts of use to the same computational model.