• Deutsch
Internal Login

Open Access

  • Home
  • Search
  • Browse
  • Publish
  • FAQ
  • Institutes

Sozialwesen (SW)

  • Bachelor Soziale Arbeit online (Basa-online) (4) subscribe to RSS feed
  • Master Jugendhilfe (23) subscribe to RSS feed
  • Studiengang Soziale Arbeit (514) subscribe to RSS feed

Refine

Author

  • Jucks, Regina (2) (remove)

Year of publication

  • 2018 (1)
  • 2016 (1)

Document Type

  • Article (2) (remove)

Language

  • English (2)

Has Fulltext

  • no (2)

Is part of the Bibliography

  • no (2)

Institute

  • Sozialwesen (SW) (2)

2 search hits

  • 1 to 2
  • BibTeX
  • CSV
  • RIS
  • 10
  • 20
  • 50
  • 100

Sort by

  • Year
  • Year
  • Title
  • Title
  • Author
  • Author
‘Can I Trust the Spoken Dialogue System Because It Uses the Same Words as I Do?’—Influence of Lexically Aligned Spoken Dialogue Systems on Trustworthiness and User Satisfaction (2018)
Linnemann, Gesa ; Jucks, Regina
One of many ways in which spoken dialogue systems (SDS) are becoming more and more flexible is in their choice of words (e.g. alignment to the user’s vocabulary). We examined how users perceive such adaptive and non-adaptive SDS regarding trustworthiness and usability. In Experiment 1, 130 participants read out questions to an SDS that either made or did not make lexical alignment in its replies. They perceived higher cognitive demand when the SDS did not employ alignment. In Experiment 2, 135 participants listened to a conversation between a human and the same SDS in an online study. They judged the aligned SDS to have more integrity and to be more likeable. Implications for the design of SDS are discussed.
As in the Question, so in the Answer? - Language Style of Human and Machine Speakers Affects Interlocutors’ Convergence on Wordings (2016)
Linnemann, Gesa ; Jucks, Regina
People adapt their word choice to both humans and computers. In this study, language style (elaborated vs. restricted) and perceived conversational partner (human vs. spoken dialogue system) were varied. Convergence was greater when reacting to a restricted language style. Participants preferred human partners and an elaborated language style. In line with communication accommodation theory, results suggest that considering restricted capabilities (cognitive organization) constitutes a central motive for convergence. Implications for spoken dialogue system design are discussed.
  • 1 to 2

OPUS4 Logo

  • Contact
  • Imprint
  • Sitelinks