iSuN Institut für Nachhaltige Ernährung
Refine
Year
Publication Type
- Article (30) (remove)
Language
- German (16)
- English (11)
- Multiple languages (3)
Keywords
Faculty
- Oecotrophologie · Facility Management (OEF) (30) (remove)
The nutritional footprint - An assessment tool for health and environmental effects of nutrition
(2014)
Food-processing companies are controlled by societal influences and economic interests, but their efforts with regard to reducing food loss and waste are very different. This qualitative study aims to identify basic recommendations of good practice for the food-processing industry in order to prevent and handle food loss and waste. For this purpose, a comprehensive literature review was conducted in the field of food waste prevention and data was collected from thirteen German companies. The findings summarize the recommendations of good practice, which cover the entire supply chain from supplier to consumer and beyond. The analysis showed that the participating companies are already partially aware of operational measures, even if they are applied or mentioned without a systematic approach. Furthermore, the analysis revealed that most activities relate to internal matters, like processing, employees and utilization. However, the responsibility of foodprocessing companies does not end with internal processes to reduce food waste. The results show that some companies are already aware of their responsibility to be involved along the entire supply chain. Finally, the results show that the needs of consumers and suppliers must also be considered in order to reduce food waste, in addition to direct reduction measures. This paper highlights nine important stages and 53 basic recommendations for companies to address food loss and waste in order to improve their practices.
"Die Warmhaltezeit zubereiteter Speisen ist zu minimieren, möglichst auf maximal 30 Minuten. Eine Warmhaltezeit von über drei Stunden ist inakzeptabel" (DGE 2009). Derartige Empfehlungen sprechen die Deutsche Gesellschaft für Ernährung (2009), der aid infodienst (2010), die Verbraucherzentrale Nord rheinWestfalen (2010) und andere Institutionen zum Warmhalten von Speisen in der Gemeinschaftsverpflegung aus. Ihre Begründung liegt in den ernährungsphysiologischen, sensorischen und gegebenenfalls sogar hygienischen Einbußen der Speisenqualität. Die Realität sieht in der Regel jedoch anders aus. Insgesamt gestattet die vorhandene Datenlage keine fundierte Beurteilung, ob das Warmhaltesystem eine Schulverpflegung von ausreichender ernährungsphysiologischer Qualität ermöglicht. Die empfohlenen Warmhaltezeiten werden in der Praxis häufig überschritten, was zumindest die sensorische Qualität, aber auch den Nährstofferhalt beeinflussen dürfte. Daher sind neue und weiterführende Untersuchungen der Speisequalität im Warmhaltesystem dringend geboten.