TY  - JOUR
A1  - Busse, Theresa Sophie
A1  - Jux, Chantal
A1  - Laser, Johannes
A1  - Rasche, Peter
A1  - Vollmar, Horst Christian
A1  - Ehlers, Jan P
A1  - Kernebeck, Sven
T1  - Involving Health Care Professionals in the Development of Electronic Health Records: Scoping Review
JF  - JMIR Human Factors
N2  - Electronic health records (EHRs) are a promising approach to document and map (complex) health information gathered in health care worldwide. However, possible unintended consequences during use, which can occur owing to low usability or the lack of adaption to existing workflows (eg, high cognitive load), may pose a challenge. To prevent this, the involvement of users in the development of EHRs is crucial and growing. Overall, involvement is designed to be very multifaceted, for example, in terms of the timing, frequency, or even methods used to capture user preferences. Setting, users and their needs, and the context and practice of health care must be considered in the design and subsequent implementation of EHRs. Many different approaches to user involvement exist, each requiring a variety of methodological choices. The aim of the study was to provide an overview of the existing forms of user involvement and the circumstances they need and to provide support for the planning of new involvement processes. We conducted a scoping review to provide a database for future projects on which design of inclusion is worthwhile and to show the diversity of reporting. Using a very broad search string, we searched the PubMed, CINAHL, and Scopus databases. In addition, we searched Google Scholar. Hits were screened according to scoping review methodology and then examined, focusing on methods and materials, participants, frequency and design of the development, and competencies of the researchers involved. In total, 70 articles were included in the final analysis. There was a wide range of methods of involvement. Physicians and nurses were the most frequently included groups and, in most cases, were involved only once in the process. The approach of involvement (eg, co-design) was not specified in most of the studies (44/70, 63%). Further qualitative deficiencies in the reporting were evident in the presentation of the competences of members of the research and development teams. Think-aloud sessions, interviews, and prototypes were frequently used. This review provides insights into the diversity of health care professionals’ involvement in the development of EHRs. It provides an overview of the different approaches in various fields of health care. However, it also shows the necessity of considering quality standards in the development of EHRs together with future users and the need for reporting this in future studies.
Y1  - 2023
U6  - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:hbz:836-opus-173050
VL  - 10
SP  - e45598
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Kernebeck, Sven
A1  - Busse, Theresa Sophie
A1  - Ehlers, Jan Peter
A1  - Vollmar, Horst Christian
T1  - Adhärenz digitaler Interventionen im Gesundheitswesen: Definitionen, Methoden und offene Fragen
JF  - Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz
N2  - AbstractMany digital interventions rely on the participation of their users to have a positive impact. In various areas it can be observed that the use of digital interventions is often reduced or fully discontinued by the users after a short period of time. This is seen as one of the main factors that can limit the effectiveness of digital interventions. In this context, the concept of adherence to digital interventions is becoming increasingly important. Adherence to digital interventions is roughly defined as “the degree to which the user followed the program as it was designed,” which can also be paraphrased as “intended use” or “use as it is designed.” However, both the theoretical–conceptual and practical discussions regarding adherence to digital interventions still receive too little attention.The aim of this narrative review article is to shed more light on the concept of adherence to digital interventions and to distinguish it from related concepts. It also discusses the methods and metrics that can be used to operationalize adherence and the predictors that positively influence adherence. Finally, needs for action to better address adherence are considered critically.
Y1  - 2021
U6  - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:hbz:836-opus-173188
SN  - 1436-9990
VL  - 64
SP  - 1278
EP  - 1284
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Kernebeck, Sven
A1  - Kramer, Ursula
A1  - Redaelli, Marcus
A1  - Vollmar, Horst Christian
T1  - Bewerten, aber wie? – Kriterien für die Evaluation und das Reporting von Studien zu Gesundheits- und Medizin-Apps
JF  - Monitor Versorgungsforschung
Y1  - 2021
U6  - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:hbz:836-opus-173256
VL  - 14
IS  - 2
ER  -