TY  - CHAP
A1  - Ehlers, Jan Peter
A1  - Nitsche, Julia
A1  - Busse, Theresa Sophie
A1  - Kernebeck, Sven
A1  - Smetana, Jan
A1  - Taetz-Harrer, Angelika
A1  - Eulitz, Mona
A1  - Zupanic, Michaela
T1  - Digitale Lehre – Reine Informationsvermittlung oder auch Lebensraum Universität und Gemeinschaftsbildung?
T2  - digiGEBF, 18.06.2021, digital
Y1  - 2021
ER  - 
TY  - CHAP
A1  - Busse, Theresa Sophie
A1  - Jux, Chantal
A1  - Kernebeck, Sven
A1  - Meyer, Dorothee
A1  - Dreier, Larissa
A1  - Zenz, Daniel
A1  - Wager, Julia
A1  - Zernikow, Boris
A1  - Ehlers, Jan Peter
T1  - "Manchmal gehen die Faxgeräte gerade nicht so wie sie sollen. Dann kommt irgendwie nichts an und dann ruft man das fünfte Mal an." - Nutzung von Design Thinking zur partizipativen Entwicklung einer elektronischen Fallakte in der pädiatrischen Palliativversorgung
T2  - 20. Deutscher Kongress für Versorgungsforschung, 06. - 08.10.2021, digital
Y1  - 2021
U6  - http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/21dkvf220
ER  - 
TY  - CHAP
A1  - Jux, Chantal
A1  - Busse, Theresa Sophie
A1  - Kernebeck, Sven
A1  - Dreier, L.A.
A1  - Meyer, Dorothee
A1  - Zenz, Daniel
A1  - Wager, Julia
A1  - Zernikow, Boris
A1  - Ehlers, Jan Peter
T1  - Nutzung von User-Stories zur partizipativen Entwicklung einer elektronischen Patient*innenakte (EPA) für die spezialisierte ambulante pädiatrische Palliativversorgung (SAPPV) - ein Erfahrungsbericht aus Perspektive der Versorgungsforschung
T2  - 20. Deutscher Kongress für Versorgungsforschung, 08.10.2021, digital
Y1  - 2021
U6  - http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/21dkvf254
ER  - 
TY  - CHAP
A1  - Kernebeck, Sven
A1  - Vollmar, Horst Christian
T1  - Qualität von Gesundheits- und Fitnessapps
T2  - Telemedizin und eHealth
Y1  - 2021
SN  - 978-3-437-23545-0
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Busse, Theresa Sophie
A1  - Jux, Chantal
A1  - Kernebeck, Sven
A1  - Meister, Sven
A1  - Ehlers, Jan P.
T1  - Steigerung der Versorgungsqualität in der Palliativversorgung durch elektronische Gesundheitsakten
JF  - Monitor Versorgungsforschung
Y1  - 2021
U6  - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:hbz:836-opus-173035
SN  - 1866-0533
VL  - 14
SP  - 45
EP  - 50
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Busse, Theresa Sophie
A1  - Kernebeck, Sven
A1  - Nef, Larissa
A1  - Rebacz, Patrick
A1  - Kickbusch, Ilona
A1  - Ehlers, Jan Peter
T1  - Views on Using Social Robots in Professional Caregiving: Content Analysis of a Scenario Method Workshop (Preprint)
JF  - J Med Internet Res
N2  - BACKGROUND Interest in digital technologies in the health care sector is growing and can be a way to reduce the burden on professional caregivers while helping people to become more independent. Social robots are regarded as a special form of technology that can be usefully applied in professional caregiving with the potential to focus on interpersonal contact. While implementation is progressing slowly, a debate on the concepts and applications of social robots in future care is necessary. OBJECTIVE In addition to existing studies with a focus on societal attitudes toward social robots, there is a need to understand the views of professional caregivers and patients. This study used desired future scenarios to collate the perspectives of experts and analyze the significance for developing the place of social robots in care. METHODS In February 2020, an expert workshop was held with 88 participants (health professionals and educators; [PhD] students of medicine, health care, professional care, and technology; patient advocates; software developers; government representatives; and research fellows) from Austria, Germany, and Switzerland. Using the scenario methodology, the possibilities of analog professional care (Analog Care), fully robotic professional care (Robotic Care), teams of robots and professional caregivers (Deep Care), and professional caregivers supported by robots (Smart Care) were discussed. The scenarios were used as a stimulus for the development of ideas about future professional caregiving. The discussion was evaluated using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS The majority of the experts were in favor of care in which people are supported by technology (Deep Care) and developed similar scenarios with a focus on dignity-centeredness. The discussions then focused on the steps necessary for its implementation, highlighting a strong need for the development of eHealth competence in society, a change in the training of professional caregivers, and cross-sectoral concepts. The experts also saw user acceptance as crucial to the use of robotics. This involves the acceptance of both professional caregivers and care recipients. CONCLUSIONS The literature review and subsequent workshop revealed how decision-making about the value of social robots depends on personal characteristics related to experience and values. There is therefore a strong need to recognize individual perspectives of care before social robots become an integrated part of care in the future.
Y1  - 2021
U6  - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:hbz:836-opus-173072
VL  - 23
IS  - 11
ER  -