TY - CHAP A1 - Kernebeck, Sven A1 - Redaelli, Marcus A1 - Kramer, Ursula A1 - Vollmar, Horst Christian T1 - Wie sollen digitale Gesundheitsanwendungen durch die Versorgungsforschung evaluiert werden? T2 - 18. Deutscher Kongress für Versorgungsforschung (DKVF). Berlin, 09.-11.10.2019 Y1 - 2019 U6 - http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/19dkvf029 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Kernebeck, Sven A1 - Busse, Theresa Sophie A1 - Kramer, Ursula A1 - Redaelli, Marcus A1 - Ehlers, Jan Peter A1 - Vollmar, Horst Christian T1 - Pandemie-Management und Digital Health - Merkmale und Qualität von Smartphone-Apps im Kontext der COVID-19 Pandemie T2 - 19. Deutscher Kongress für Versorgungsforschung, September 2020, online Y1 - 2020 U6 - http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/20dkvf036 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Kernebeck, Sven A1 - Redaelli, Marcus. A1 - Kramer, Ursula A1 - Vollmar, Horst Christian T1 - Frameworks und Reporting Guidelines und Digital Health - Merkmale und Anwendungsmöglichkeiten verfügbarer Frameworks und Reporting Guidelines für Studien zu Gesundheits- und Medizin-Apps T2 - 19. Deutscher Kongress für Versorgungsforschung, 30.09. - 01.10.2020, digital Y1 - 2020 U6 - http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/20dkvf286 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Kernebeck, Sven A1 - Vollmar, Horst Christian T1 - Qualität von Gesundheits- und Fitnessapps T2 - Telemedizin und eHealth Y1 - 2021 SN - 978-3-437-23545-0 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Busse, Theresa Sophie A1 - Jux, Chantal A1 - Laser, Johannes A1 - Rasche, Peter A1 - Vollmar, Horst Christian A1 - Ehlers, Jan P A1 - Kernebeck, Sven T1 - Involving Health Care Professionals in the Development of Electronic Health Records: Scoping Review JF - JMIR Human Factors N2 - Electronic health records (EHRs) are a promising approach to document and map (complex) health information gathered in health care worldwide. However, possible unintended consequences during use, which can occur owing to low usability or the lack of adaption to existing workflows (eg, high cognitive load), may pose a challenge. To prevent this, the involvement of users in the development of EHRs is crucial and growing. Overall, involvement is designed to be very multifaceted, for example, in terms of the timing, frequency, or even methods used to capture user preferences. Setting, users and their needs, and the context and practice of health care must be considered in the design and subsequent implementation of EHRs. Many different approaches to user involvement exist, each requiring a variety of methodological choices. The aim of the study was to provide an overview of the existing forms of user involvement and the circumstances they need and to provide support for the planning of new involvement processes. We conducted a scoping review to provide a database for future projects on which design of inclusion is worthwhile and to show the diversity of reporting. Using a very broad search string, we searched the PubMed, CINAHL, and Scopus databases. In addition, we searched Google Scholar. Hits were screened according to scoping review methodology and then examined, focusing on methods and materials, participants, frequency and design of the development, and competencies of the researchers involved. In total, 70 articles were included in the final analysis. There was a wide range of methods of involvement. Physicians and nurses were the most frequently included groups and, in most cases, were involved only once in the process. The approach of involvement (eg, co-design) was not specified in most of the studies (44/70, 63%). Further qualitative deficiencies in the reporting were evident in the presentation of the competences of members of the research and development teams. Think-aloud sessions, interviews, and prototypes were frequently used. This review provides insights into the diversity of health care professionals’ involvement in the development of EHRs. It provides an overview of the different approaches in various fields of health care. However, it also shows the necessity of considering quality standards in the development of EHRs together with future users and the need for reporting this in future studies. Y1 - 2023 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:hbz:836-opus-173050 VL - 10 SP - e45598 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Kernebeck, Sven A1 - Scheibe, Madlen A1 - Sinha, Monika A1 - Fischer, Florian A1 - Knapp, Andreas A1 - Timpel, Patrick A1 - Harst, Lorenz A1 - Reininghaus, Ulrich A1 - Vollmar, Horst Christian T1 - Digitale Gesundheitsinterventionen entwickeln, evaluieren und implementieren Teil II – Diskussionspapier der Arbeitsgruppe Digital Health des Deutschen Netzwerk Versorgungsforschung (DNVF) JF - Das Gesundheitswesen N2 - Abstract The methodological challenges of evaluating digital interventions (DI) for health services research are omnipresent. The Digital Health Working Group of the German Network for Health Services Research (DNVF) presented and discussed these challenges in a two-part discussion paper. The first part addressed challenges in definition, development and evaluation of DI. In this paper, which represents the second part, the definition of outcomes, reporting of results, synthesis of evidence, and implementation are addressed as methodological challenges of DI. Potential solutions are presented and the need to address these challenges in future research are discussed. Y1 - 2022 U6 - http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1915-4371 SN - 0941-3790 VL - 85 SP - 65 EP - 70 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Kernebeck, Sven A1 - Busse, Theresa Sophie A1 - Vollmar, Horst Christian T1 - E-Health-Ökonomie II, Evaluation und Implementierung T2 - E-Health-Ökonomie II, Evaluation und Implementierung N2 - Eine intransparente, unvollständige und unpräzise Berichtserstattung von Forschungsergebnissen ist ein beständiges Problem in der Bio-Medizinischen Forschung. Dies führt zu einer eingeschränkten Nachvollziehbarkeit von Forschungsergebnissen und schränkt die Übertragbarkeit der Ergebnisse deutlich ein. Auch bei Studien zu digitalen Interventionen im Bereich Electronic-Health (E-Health) ist die intransparente, unvollständige und unpräzise Berichtserstattung von Forschungsergebnissen zunehmend in der Diskussion. Dieser Beitrag verfolgt drei wesentliche Ziele: Es wird dargestellt, warum ein qualitativ hochwertiges Reporting von Studienergebnissen zu digitalen Interventionen von hoher Relevanz ist. Auf dieser Basis werden ausgewählte Reporting Guidelines und Frameworks beschrieben, die für das Berichten von Studienergebnissen zu digitalen Interventionen entwickelt wurden. Zudem werden weitere Elemente beschrieben, die die Berichterstattung unterstützen können, wie etwa ein Evidenzkonzept und allgemeine Entwicklungsmodelle digitaler Interventionen. Y1 - 2022 SN - 9783658356903 U6 - http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-35691-0_4 SP - 47 EP - 69 ER -