TY - JOUR A1 - Busse, Theresa Sophie A1 - Nitsche, Julia A1 - Kernebeck, Sven A1 - Jux, Chantal A1 - Weitz, Jürgen A1 - Ehlers, Jan P. A1 - Bork, Ulrich T1 - Approaches to Improvement of Digital Health Literacy (eHL) in the Context of Person-Centered Care JF - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health N2 - The skills, knowledge and resources to search for, find, understand, evaluate and apply health information is defined as health literacy (HL). If individuals want to use health information from the Internet, they need Digital Health Literacy (eHL), which in addition to HL also includes, for example, media literacy. If information cannot be found or understood by patients due to low (e)HL, patients will not have the opportunity to make informed decisions. In addition, many health apps for self-management or prevention also require (e)HL. Thus, it follows that active participation in healthcare, in terms of Person-Centered Care (PCC) is only possible through (e)HL. Currently, there is a great need to strengthen these competencies in society to achieve increased empowerment of patients and their health. However, at the same time, there is a need to train and improve competencies in the field of healthcare professionals so that they can counsel and guide patients. This article provides an overview with a focus on HL and eHL in healthcare, shows the opportunities to adapt services and describes the possible handling of patients with low (e)HL. In addition, the opportunities for patients and healthcare professionals to improve (e)HL are highlighted. Y1 - 2022 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:hbz:836-opus-173115 SN - 1661-7827 VL - 19 SP - 8309 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Kernebeck, Sven A1 - Busse, Theresa Sophie A1 - Vollmar, Horst Christian T1 - E-Health-Ökonomie II, Evaluation und Implementierung T2 - E-Health-Ökonomie II, Evaluation und Implementierung N2 - Eine intransparente, unvollständige und unpräzise Berichtserstattung von Forschungsergebnissen ist ein beständiges Problem in der Bio-Medizinischen Forschung. Dies führt zu einer eingeschränkten Nachvollziehbarkeit von Forschungsergebnissen und schränkt die Übertragbarkeit der Ergebnisse deutlich ein. Auch bei Studien zu digitalen Interventionen im Bereich Electronic-Health (E-Health) ist die intransparente, unvollständige und unpräzise Berichtserstattung von Forschungsergebnissen zunehmend in der Diskussion. Dieser Beitrag verfolgt drei wesentliche Ziele: Es wird dargestellt, warum ein qualitativ hochwertiges Reporting von Studienergebnissen zu digitalen Interventionen von hoher Relevanz ist. Auf dieser Basis werden ausgewählte Reporting Guidelines und Frameworks beschrieben, die für das Berichten von Studienergebnissen zu digitalen Interventionen entwickelt wurden. Zudem werden weitere Elemente beschrieben, die die Berichterstattung unterstützen können, wie etwa ein Evidenzkonzept und allgemeine Entwicklungsmodelle digitaler Interventionen. Y1 - 2022 SN - 9783658356903 U6 - http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-35691-0_4 SP - 47 EP - 69 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Kernebeck, Sven A1 - Busse, Theresa Sophie A1 - Jux, Chantal A1 - Dreier, Larissa Alice A1 - Meyer, Dorothee A1 - Zenz, Daniel A1 - Zernikow, Boris A1 - Ehlers, Jan Peter T1 - Evaluation of an Electronic Medical Record Module for Nursing Documentation in Paediatric Palliative Care: Involvement of Nurses with a Think-Aloud Approach JF - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health N2 - Background: Paediatric palliative care (PPC) is a noncurative approach to the care of children and adolescents with life-limiting and life-threatening illnesses. Electronic medical records (EMRs) play an important role in documenting such complex processes. Despite their benefits, they can introduce unintended consequences if future users are not involved in their development. Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the acceptance of a novel module for nursing documentation by nurses working in the context of PPC. Methods: An observational study employing concurrent think-aloud and semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 11 nurses working in PPC. Based on the main determinants of the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT), data were analysed using qualitative content analysis. Results: The main determinants of UTAUT were found to potentially influence acceptance of the novel module. Participants perceived the module to be self-explanatory and intuitive. Some adaptations, such as the reduction of fragmentation in the display, the optimization of confusing mouseover fields, and the use of familiar nursing terminology, are reasonable ways of increasing software adoption. Conclusions: After adaptation of the modules based on the results, further evaluation with the participation of future users is required. Y1 - 2022 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:hbz:836-opus-173137 SN - 1661-7827 VL - 19 SP - 3637 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Kernebeck, Sven A1 - Jux, Chantal A1 - Busse, Theresa Sophie A1 - Meyer, Dorothee A1 - Dreier, Larissa Alice A1 - Zenz, Daniel A1 - Zernikow, Boris A1 - Ehlers, Jan Peter T1 - Participatory Design of a Medication Module in an Electronic Medical Record for Paediatric Palliative Care: A Think-Aloud Approach with Nurses and Physicians JF - Children N2 - Background: Electronic medical records (EMRs) play a key role in improving documentation and quality of care in paediatric palliative care (PPC). Inadequate EMR design can cause incorrect prescription and administration of medications. Due to the fact of complex diseases and the resulting high level of medical complexity, patients in PPC are vulnerable to medication errors. Consequently, involving users in the development process is important. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the acceptance of a medication module from the perspective of potential users in PPC and to involve them in the development process. Methods: A qualitative observational study was conducted with 10 nurses and four physicians using a concurrent think-aloud protocol and semi-structured qualitative interviews. A qualitative content analysis was applied based on a unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Results: Requirements from the user’s perspective could be identified as possible influences on acceptance and actual use. Requirements were grouped into the categories “performance expectancies” and “effort expectancies”. Conclusions: The results serve as a basis for further development. Attention should be given to the reduction of display fragmentation, as it decreases cognitive load. Further approaches to evaluation should be taken. Y1 - 2022 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:hbz:836-opus-173146 SN - 2227-9067 VL - 9 SP - 82 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Kernebeck, Sven A1 - Jux, Chantal A1 - Busse, Theresa Sophie A1 - Meyer, Dorothee A1 - Dreier, Larissa Alice A1 - Zenz, Daniel A1 - Zernikow, Boris A1 - Ehlers, Jan Peter T1 - Participatory Design of a Medication Module in an Electronic Medical Record for Paediatric Palliative Care: A Think-Aloud Approach with Nurses and Physicians JF - Children N2 - Background: Electronic medical records (EMRs) play a key role in improving documentation and quality of care in paediatric palliative care (PPC). Inadequate EMR design can cause incorrect prescription and administration of medications. Due to the fact of complex diseases and the resulting high level of medical complexity, patients in PPC are vulnerable to medication errors. Consequently, involving users in the development process is important. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the acceptance of a medication module from the perspective of potential users in PPC and to involve them in the development process. Methods: A qualitative observational study was conducted with 10 nurses and four physicians using a concurrent think-aloud protocol and semi-structured qualitative interviews. A qualitative content analysis was applied based on a unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Results: Requirements from the user’s perspective could be identified as possible influences on acceptance and actual use. Requirements were grouped into the categories “performance expectancies” and “effort expectancies”. Conclusions: The results serve as a basis for further development. Attention should be given to the reduction of display fragmentation, as it decreases cognitive load. Further approaches to evaluation should be taken. Y1 - 2022 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:hbz:836-opus-173158 SN - 2227-9067 VL - 9 SP - 82 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Busse, Theresa Sophie A1 - Kernebeck, Sven A1 - Ehlers, Jan Peter T1 - Projektbericht – partizipative Entwicklung eines elektronischen Aktensystems– Erfahrungen und Übertragung auf ePA und ePA-nahe Anwendungen. T2 - eHealth Monitor 2022 Y1 - 2023 SN - 978-3-95466-759-8 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Kernebeck, Sven T1 - eHealth Literacy und Schmerz - Relevanz der digitalen Gesundheitskompetenz als Merkmal guter Schmerzedukation T2 - Schmerzedukation - Schmerzexpertise nach dem EFIC-Curriculum Y1 - 2023 SN - 978-3-456-86216-3 PB - Hogrefe ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Busse, Theresa Sophie A1 - Jux, Chantal A1 - Laser, Johannes A1 - Rasche, Peter A1 - Vollmar, Horst Christian A1 - Ehlers, Jan P A1 - Kernebeck, Sven T1 - Involving Health Care Professionals in the Development of Electronic Health Records: Scoping Review JF - JMIR Human Factors N2 - Electronic health records (EHRs) are a promising approach to document and map (complex) health information gathered in health care worldwide. However, possible unintended consequences during use, which can occur owing to low usability or the lack of adaption to existing workflows (eg, high cognitive load), may pose a challenge. To prevent this, the involvement of users in the development of EHRs is crucial and growing. Overall, involvement is designed to be very multifaceted, for example, in terms of the timing, frequency, or even methods used to capture user preferences. Setting, users and their needs, and the context and practice of health care must be considered in the design and subsequent implementation of EHRs. Many different approaches to user involvement exist, each requiring a variety of methodological choices. The aim of the study was to provide an overview of the existing forms of user involvement and the circumstances they need and to provide support for the planning of new involvement processes. We conducted a scoping review to provide a database for future projects on which design of inclusion is worthwhile and to show the diversity of reporting. Using a very broad search string, we searched the PubMed, CINAHL, and Scopus databases. In addition, we searched Google Scholar. Hits were screened according to scoping review methodology and then examined, focusing on methods and materials, participants, frequency and design of the development, and competencies of the researchers involved. In total, 70 articles were included in the final analysis. There was a wide range of methods of involvement. Physicians and nurses were the most frequently included groups and, in most cases, were involved only once in the process. The approach of involvement (eg, co-design) was not specified in most of the studies (44/70, 63%). Further qualitative deficiencies in the reporting were evident in the presentation of the competences of members of the research and development teams. Think-aloud sessions, interviews, and prototypes were frequently used. This review provides insights into the diversity of health care professionals’ involvement in the development of EHRs. It provides an overview of the different approaches in various fields of health care. However, it also shows the necessity of considering quality standards in the development of EHRs together with future users and the need for reporting this in future studies. Y1 - 2023 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:hbz:836-opus-173050 VL - 10 SP - e45598 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Kernebeck, Sven A1 - Busse, Theresa Sophie A1 - Fischer, Florian A1 - Ehlers, Jan P. T1 - Partizipatives Design im Kontext gesundheitsbezogener Technologien – Herausforderungen und Handlungserfordernisse aus Perspektive der Versorgungsforschung JF - Das Gesundheitswesen N2 - Partizipatives Design (PD) ermöglicht den Einbezug von Nutzer:innen in den Entwicklungsprozess digitaler Technologien im Gesundheitswesen. Der Einsatz von PD birgt jedoch Hürden, da theoretische und methodische Entscheidungen zu treffen sind. Oftmals werden diese in Forschungsarbeiten in der Versorgungsforschung nicht hinreichend dargestellt oder begründet. Dies kann zu einer eingeschränkten Bewertbarkeit und Nachvollziehbarkeit der Ergebnisse führen. Der vorliegende Beitrag thematisiert drei Schwerpunkte: Erstens wird ein Überblick über die wesentlichen theoretischen und methodischen Entscheidungen gegeben, die im Rahmen des PD aus Perspektive der Versorgungsforschung getroffen werden müssen. Zweitens werden die damit einhergehenden Herausforderungen aufgezeigt und drittens Erfordernisse für die zukünftige Anwendung und (Weiter-)Entwicklung des PD in der Versorgungsforschung beschrieben. Y1 - 2024 U6 - http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-2184-5731 SN - 0941-3790 SP - 1 EP - 6 ER -