TY - JOUR A1 - Mazziotta, Agostino A1 - Mummendey, Amélie A1 - Wright, Stephen C. T1 - Vicarious intergroup contact effects: Applying social-cognitive theory to intergroup contact research JF - Group Processes and Intergroup Relations Y1 - 2011 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430210390533 VL - 14 SP - 255 EP - 274 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Tropp, Linda, R. A1 - Mazziotta, Agostino A1 - Wright, Stephen C. T1 - Recent developments in intergroup contact research: Affective processes, group status, and contact valence T2 - Cambridge handbook of the psychology of prejudice / Ed.: Chris G. Sibley, Fiona K. Barlow Y1 - 2017 SN - 978-1-316-16157-9 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316161579 SP - 463 EP - 481 PB - Cambridge University Press CY - Cambridge ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Wright, Stephen C. A1 - Mazziotta, Agostino A1 - Tropp, Linda R. T1 - Contact and intergroup conflict: New ideas for the road ahead JF - Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology Y1 - 2017 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000272 VL - 23 SP - 317 EP - 327 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Wright, Stephen C. A1 - Tropp, Linda R. A1 - Mazziotta, Agostino T1 - Contact between groups, peace, and conflict JF - Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology Y1 - 2017 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000273 VL - 23 SP - 207 EP - 209 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Mazziotta, Agostino A1 - Rohmann, Anette A1 - Wright, Stephen C. A1 - De Tezanos-Pinto, Pablo A1 - Lutterbach, Sebastian T1 - (How) Does positive and negative extended cross-group contact predict direct cross-group contact and intergroup attitudes? JF - European Journal of Social Psychology Y1 - 2015 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2110 VL - 45 SP - 653 EP - 667 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Shum, Priscilla A1 - Mylett, Marisa A1 - Levin, Ziv A1 - Wright, Stephen C. A1 - Mazziotta, Agostino A1 - Droogendyk, Lisa A1 - Bitacola, Lisa M. T1 - Indirect contact and collective action among disadvantaged groups: A multi-level mini-meta-analysis JF - Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology N2 - It is well established that positive contact between members of different groups can reduce prejudice. However, there is also evidence that direct contact with advantaged group members can undermine disadvantaged group members' engagement in collective action. Also, considerable evidence shows that effective contact need not be direct. Mere knowledge of cross-group friendships (extended contact) or observing positive contact (vicarious contact) can also reduce prejudice. This raises the question of whether these indirect forms of contact might also undermine collective action. We conducted a mini-meta-analysis of eight unpublished studies, including a range of intergroup contexts and samples, that measured indirect contact with advantaged group members and collective action among disadvantaged groups. We found a small but significant relationship that was consistently negative but varied in size depending on how indirect contact was measured. Contrary to expectation, more indirect contact predicted reductions in normative forms of collective action as strongly as radical forms. Y1 - 2025 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:hbz:836-opus-191540 VL - 35 IS - 3 SP - 1 EP - 17 PB - Wiley ER -