@incollection{GoebelTeitscheidFriedrichetal.2017,
  author    = {G{\"o}bel, Christine and Teitscheid, Petra and Friedrich, Silke and Langen, Nina and Speck, Melanie and Engelmann, Tobias and Rohn, Holger},
  title     = {Implementing Sustainable Business Models in the Hospitality Sector with the Help of a Mission Statement},
  series = {Proceedings in System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks 2017},
  booktitle = {Proceedings in System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks 2017},
  pages     = {323 -- 328},
  year      = {2017},
  language  = {en}
}
@incollection{EngelmannSpeckRohnetal.2017,
  author    = {Engelmann, Tobias and Speck, Melanie and Rohn, Holger and Bienge, Katrin and Langen, Nina and Howell, Eva and G{\"o}bel, Christine and Friedrich, Silke and Teitscheid, Petra and Liedtke, Christa},
  title     = {Sustainability assessment of out of-of-home meals: potentials and obstacles applying indicator sets NAHGAST Meal-Basis and NAHGAST Meal-Pro},
  series = {Proceedings in System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks 2017},
  booktitle = {Proceedings in System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks 2017},
  doi       = {10.18461/pfsd.2017.1735},
  pages     = {329 -- 338},
  year      = {2017},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{LangenOhlhausenFriedrichetal.2018,
  author    = {Langen, Nina and Ohlhausen, P. and Friedrich, Silke and G{\"o}bel, Christine and Teitscheid, Petra and Engelmann, Tobias and Rohn, H. and Bienge, K. and Speck, M.},
  title     = {Auf der Suche nach dem wirksamsten Nudge zur Absatzsteigerung nachhaltiger Speisen in der Außer-Haus-Gastronomie},
  series = {Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung},
  volume    = {87. Jahrgang},
  journal   = {Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung},
  issn      = {0340-1707},
  doi       = {10.3790/vjh.87.2.95},
  pages     = {95 -- 108},
  year      = {2018},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{EngelmannSpeckRohnetal.2018,
  author    = {Engelmann, Tobias and Speck, M. and Rohn, H. and Bienge, K. and Langen, Nina and Howell, E. and G{\"o}bel, Christine and Friedrich, Silke and Teitscheid, Petra and Bowry, J. and Liedke, C. and Monetti, S.},
  title     = {Sustainability Assessment of Out-of-Home Meals: Potentials and Challengens of Applying the Indicator sets NAHGAST Meal-Basic and NAHGAST Meal-Pro.},
  series = {Sustainability Journal},
  journal   = {Sustainability Journal},
  doi       = {10.3390/su10020562},
  pages     = {1 -- 22},
  year      = {2018},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{LangenOhlhausenSteinmeieretal.2022,
  author    = {Langen, Nina and Ohlhausen, Pascal and Steinmeier, Fara and Friedrich, Silke and Engelmann, Tobias and Speck, Melanie and Damerau, Kerstin and Rohn, Holger and Teitscheid, Petra},
  title     = {Nudges for more sustainable food choices in the out-of-home catering sector applied in real-world labs},
  series = {Resources, Conservation and Recycling},
  journal   = {Resources, Conservation and Recycling},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106167},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Food production is responsible for approximately 17\% of Germany's greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. After retail, out-of-home catering is the second largest food sales channel in Germany. A variety of means on both the supply and demand side are necessary to stimulate, facilitate and encourage a more sustainable development and minimise GHG emissions in this sector. Nudges are one of these. This paper's focus lies on the demand side. Set in real-world laboratories, we use a standardised empirical approach to compare different nudging interventions belonging to the area of physical environment and consumers' choice making process. We compare the effects of the same intervention across different settings and the effect of different, sequential nudging interventions in the same setting. Data was collected in eight workplace and school cafeterias in Germany over two project iterations (2016/2017; 2019/2020). A similar intervention design was applied. Comparability was assured by a harmonised menu. The first project iteration revealed that only one nudge (top menu position, +22.5\%) led to significant increases in sustainable food choices, while results from the second iteration showed that all nudge interventions (best counter position, +11.6\%; top menu position, +6,9\%; label plus information, +15.9\%) positively influenced consumer choice. Possible explanations such as the stricter compliance to the experimental design in the cafeterias but also societal developments such as the appearance of the Fridays for Future movement are discussed. As results vary between specific locations and settings, our findings suggest that nudges need to be adjusted to situational conditions for achieving highest efficacy.},
  language  = {en}
}