@article{NitscheSmetanaKochaneketal.2021,
  author    = {Nitsche, Julia and Smetana, Jan and Kochanek, Tonja and Busse, Theresa Sophie and Kernebeck, Sven and Taetz-Harrer, Angelika and Zupanic, Michaela and Eulitz, Mona and Ehlers, Jan P.},
  title     = {Needs must when the devil drives - Migration of an entire university to digital teaching},
  series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Hochschulentwicklung},
  volume    = {16},
  journal   = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Hochschulentwicklung},
  number    = {3},
  doi       = {10.25974/fhms-17316},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:hbz:836-opus-173168},
  year      = {2021},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{NitscheBusseKernebecketal.2022,
  author    = {Nitsche, Julia and Busse, Theresa Sophie and Kernebeck, Sven and Ehlers, Jan P.},
  title     = {Virtual Classrooms and Their Challenge of Interaction—An Evaluation of Chat Activities and Logs in an Online Course about Digital Medicine with Heterogeneous Participants},
  series = {International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health},
  volume    = {19},
  journal   = {International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health},
  issn      = {1661-7827},
  doi       = {10.25974/fhms-17308},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:hbz:836-opus-173083},
  pages     = {10184},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Learning digital competencies can be successful if the information is also tried out immediately using interactive elements. However, interactive teaching poses a particular challenge, especially in large group formats. Various strategies are used to promote interaction, but there is little known about the results. This article shows different strategies and evaluates their influence on the interaction rate in a large group course over two terms that teaches digital medicine. Log files and participation in surveys as well as participation in chat were quantitatively evaluated. In addition, the chat messages themselves were evaluated qualitatively. For the evaluation, relation to the total number of participants was particularly relevant in order to be able to determine an interaction rate in the individual course sessions. A maximum average interaction rate of 90.97\% could be determined over the entire term while the participants wrote an average of 3.96 comments during a session in the chat. In summary, this research could show that interactive elements should be well planned and used at regular intervals in order to reap the benefits.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{MeyerKernebeckBusseetal.2021,
  author    = {Meyer, Dorothee and Kernebeck, Sven and Busse, Theresa Sophie and Ehlers, Jan and Wager, Julia and Zernikow, Boris and Dreier, Larissa Alice},
  title     = {Electronic Health Records in Specialized Pediatric Palliative Care: A Qualitative Needs Assessment among Professionals Experienced and Inexperienced in Electronic Documentation},
  series = {Children},
  volume    = {8},
  journal   = {Children},
  issn      = {2227-9067},
  doi       = {10.25974/fhms-17326},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:hbz:836-opus-173265},
  pages     = {249},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Background: Currently, to the best of our knowledge, no findings exist concerning the needs of professionals in specialized pediatric palliative care (PPC) regarding electronic health records (EHRs). Several studies have highlighted benefits concerning the use of EHRs in pediatrics. However, usability is strongly affected by the degree of adaptivity to the context of application. The aim of this study is to examine the needs of professionals concerning an EHR in the specialized PPC inpatient and outpatient settings. Methods: A qualitative research design was chosen to address the complex aspects of user demands. Focus group interviews and semi-structured one-on-one interviews were conducted with PPC professionals. N = 23 participants from inpatient and N = 11 participants from outpatient settings of specialized PPC representing various professions took part in the study. Results: The findings could be grouped into four categories: (1) attitude towards the current methods of documentation, (2) attitude towards electronic documentation in general, (3) general requirements for an EHR, and (4) content requirements for an EHR. Conclusions: Professionals in specialized PPC expect and experience many benefits of using electronic documentation. Their requirements for an EHR for inpatient and outpatient settings of PPC are largely consistent with EHRs for pediatrics. However, individual specifications and adaptations are necessary for this particular setting.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KornBoettcherBusseetal.2022,
  author    = {Korn, Sandra and B{\"o}ttcher, Maximilian David and Busse, Theresa Sophie and Kernebeck, Sven and Breucha, Michael and Ehlers, Jan and Kahlert, Christoph and Weitz, J{\"u}rgen and Bork, Ulrich},
  title     = {Use and Perception of Digital Health Technologies by Surgical Patients in Germany in the Pre-COVID-19 Era: Survey Study},
  series = {JMIR Formative Research},
  volume    = {6},
  journal   = {JMIR Formative Research},
  doi       = {10.25974/fhms-17304},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:hbz:836-opus-173046},
  pages     = {e33985},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {This survey study investigates surgical patients' use and perception of digital health technologies in Germany in the pre-COVID-19 era. The objective of this study was to relate surgical patients' characteristics to the use and perception of several digital health technologies. In this single-center, cross-sectional survey study in the outpatient department of a university hospital in Germany, 406 patients completed a questionnaire with the following three domains: general information and use of the internet, smartphones, and general digital health aspects. Analyses were stratified by age group and highest education level achieved. We found significant age-based differences in most of the evaluated aspects. Younger patients were more open to using new technologies in private and medical settings but had more security concerns. Although searching for information on illnesses on the web was common, the overall acceptance of and trust in web-based consultations were rather low, with <50\% of patients in each age group reporting acceptance and trust. More people with academic qualifications than without academic qualifications searched for information on the web before visiting physicians (73/121, 60.3\% and 100/240, 41.7\%, respectively). Patients with academic degrees were also more engaged in health-related information and communication technology use. These results support the need for eHealth literacy, health literacy, and available digital devices and internet access to support the active, meaningful use of information and communication technologies in health care. Uncertainties and a lack of knowledge exist, especially regarding telemedicine and the use of medical and health apps. This is especially pronounced among older patients and patients with a low education status.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{KernebeckJuxBusseetal.2022,
  author    = {Kernebeck, Sven and Jux, Chantal and Busse, Theresa Sophie and Meyer, Dorothee and Dreier, Larissa Alice and Zenz, Daniel and Zernikow, Boris and Ehlers, Jan Peter},
  title     = {Participatory Design of a Medication Module in an Electronic Medical Record for Paediatric Palliative Care: A Think-Aloud Approach with Nurses and Physicians},
  series = {Children},
  volume    = {9},
  journal   = {Children},
  issn      = {2227-9067},
  doi       = {10.25974/fhms-17314},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:hbz:836-opus-173146},
  pages     = {82},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Background: Electronic medical records (EMRs) play a key role in improving documentation and quality of care in paediatric palliative care (PPC). Inadequate EMR design can cause incorrect prescription and administration of medications. Due to the fact of complex diseases and the resulting high level of medical complexity, patients in PPC are vulnerable to medication errors. Consequently, involving users in the development process is important. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the acceptance of a medication module from the perspective of potential users in PPC and to involve them in the development process. Methods: A qualitative observational study was conducted with 10 nurses and four physicians using a concurrent think-aloud protocol and semi-structured qualitative interviews. A qualitative content analysis was applied based on a unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Results: Requirements from the user's perspective could be identified as possible influences on acceptance and actual use. Requirements were grouped into the categories "performance expectancies" and "effort expectancies". Conclusions: The results serve as a basis for further development. Attention should be given to the reduction of display fragmentation, as it decreases cognitive load. Further approaches to evaluation should be taken.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{KernebeckJuxBusseetal.2022,
  author    = {Kernebeck, Sven and Jux, Chantal and Busse, Theresa Sophie and Meyer, Dorothee and Dreier, Larissa Alice and Zenz, Daniel and Zernikow, Boris and Ehlers, Jan Peter},
  title     = {Participatory Design of a Medication Module in an Electronic Medical Record for Paediatric Palliative Care: A Think-Aloud Approach with Nurses and Physicians},
  series = {Children},
  volume    = {9},
  journal   = {Children},
  issn      = {2227-9067},
  doi       = {10.25974/fhms-17315},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:hbz:836-opus-173158},
  pages     = {82},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Background: Electronic medical records (EMRs) play a key role in improving documentation and quality of care in paediatric palliative care (PPC). Inadequate EMR design can cause incorrect prescription and administration of medications. Due to the fact of complex diseases and the resulting high level of medical complexity, patients in PPC are vulnerable to medication errors. Consequently, involving users in the development process is important. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the acceptance of a medication module from the perspective of potential users in PPC and to involve them in the development process. Methods: A qualitative observational study was conducted with 10 nurses and four physicians using a concurrent think-aloud protocol and semi-structured qualitative interviews. A qualitative content analysis was applied based on a unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Results: Requirements from the user's perspective could be identified as possible influences on acceptance and actual use. Requirements were grouped into the categories "performance expectancies" and "effort expectancies". Conclusions: The results serve as a basis for further development. Attention should be given to the reduction of display fragmentation, as it decreases cognitive load. Further approaches to evaluation should be taken.},
  language  = {de}
}
@incollection{KernebeckBusseVollmar2022,
  author    = {Kernebeck, Sven and Busse, Theresa Sophie and Vollmar, Horst Christian},
  title     = {E-Health-{\"O}konomie II, Evaluation und Implementierung},
  series = {E-Health-{\"O}konomie II, Evaluation und Implementierung},
  booktitle = {E-Health-{\"O}konomie II, Evaluation und Implementierung},
  isbn      = {9783658356903},
  doi       = {10.1007/978-3-658-35691-0_4},
  pages     = {47 -- 69},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Eine intransparente, unvollst{\"a}ndige und unpr{\"a}zise Berichtserstattung von Forschungsergebnissen ist ein best{\"a}ndiges Problem in der Bio-Medizinischen Forschung. Dies f{\"u}hrt zu einer eingeschr{\"a}nkten Nachvollziehbarkeit von Forschungsergebnissen und schr{\"a}nkt die {\"U}bertragbarkeit der Ergebnisse deutlich ein. Auch bei Studien zu digitalen Interventionen im Bereich Electronic-Health (E-Health) ist die intransparente, unvollst{\"a}ndige und unpr{\"a}zise Berichtserstattung von Forschungsergebnissen zunehmend in der Diskussion. Dieser Beitrag verfolgt drei wesentliche Ziele: Es wird dargestellt, warum ein qualitativ hochwertiges Reporting von Studienergebnissen zu digitalen Interventionen von hoher Relevanz ist. Auf dieser Basis werden ausgew{\"a}hlte Reporting Guidelines und Frameworks beschrieben, die f{\"u}r das Berichten von Studienergebnissen zu digitalen Interventionen entwickelt wurden. Zudem werden weitere Elemente beschrieben, die die Berichterstattung unterst{\"u}tzen k{\"o}nnen, wie etwa ein Evidenzkonzept und allgemeine Entwicklungsmodelle digitaler Interventionen.},
  language  = {de}
}
@inproceedings{KernebeckBusseMeyeretal.2020,
  author    = {Kernebeck, Sven and Busse, Theresa Sophie and Meyer, Dorothee and Dreier, Larissa and Wager, Julia and Zernikow, Boris and Ehlers, Jen Peter},
  title     = {User-Centered Design und User Co-Design aus Perspektive der Versorgungsforschung - Methodische Herausforderungen bei der Evaluation von Nutzer*innenbed{\"u}rfnissen an eine Elektronische Patient*innenakte in der station{\"a}ren p{\"a}diartrischen Palliativversorgung},
  series = {19. Deutscher Kongress f{\"u}r Versorgungsforschung, 30.09. - 01.10.2020, digital},
  booktitle = {19. Deutscher Kongress f{\"u}r Versorgungsforschung, 30.09. - 01.10.2020, digital},
  doi       = {10.3205/20dkvf351},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {de}
}
@inproceedings{KernebeckBusseKrameretal.2020,
  author    = {Kernebeck, Sven and Busse, Theresa Sophie and Kramer, Ursula and Redaelli, Marcus and Ehlers, Jan Peter and Vollmar, Horst Christian},
  title     = {Pandemie-Management und Digital Health - Merkmale und Qualit{\"a}t von Smartphone-Apps im Kontext der COVID-19 Pandemie},
  series = {19. Deutscher Kongress f{\"u}r Versorgungsforschung, September 2020, online},
  booktitle = {19. Deutscher Kongress f{\"u}r Versorgungsforschung, September 2020, online},
  doi       = {10.3205/20dkvf036},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{KernebeckBusseJuxetal.2021,
  author    = {Kernebeck, Sven and Busse, Theresa Sophie and Jux, Chantal and Meyer, Dorothee and Dreier, Larissa Alice and Zenz, Daniel and Zernikow, Boris and Ehlers, Jan Peter},
  title     = {Participatory Design of an Electronic Medical Record for Paediatric Palliative Care: A Think-Aloud Study with Nurses and Physicians},
  series = {Children},
  volume    = {8},
  journal   = {Children},
  issn      = {2227-9067},
  doi       = {10.25974/fhms-17321},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:hbz:836-opus-173219},
  pages     = {695},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Background: Electronic medical records (EMRs) offer a promising approach to mapping and documenting the complex information gathered in paediatric palliative care (PPC). However, if they are not well developed, poorly implemented EMRs have unintended consequences that may cause harm to patients. One approach to preventing such harm is the involvement of users in the participatory design to ensure user acceptance and patient safety. Therefore, the aim of this study is to evaluate the acceptance of a novel patient chart module (PCM) as part of an EMR from the perspective of potential users in PPC and to involve these professionals in the design process. Methods: A qualitative observational study with N = 16 PPC professionals (n = 10 nurses, n = 6 physicians) was conducted, including concurrent think aloud (CTA) and semi-structured interviews. A structured content analysis based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology was applied. Results: The results can be summarized in terms of general observations, performance expectancy, effort expectancy and facilitating conditions, all of which are likely to have a positive influence on acceptance of the PCM from the user perspective in the context of PPC. Conclusions: The involvement of users in the development of EMRs is important for meeting the requirements in PPC. Further software adaptations are necessary to implement these requirements.},
  language  = {en}
}