@article{WintersteinPrescher2021,
  author    = {Winterstein, Ingo and Prescher, Thomas},
  title     = {Vorbilder in der Ausbildung zum Notfallsanit{\"a}ter: Eine Fragebogenstudie},
  series = {Elsevier Emergency},
  journal   = {Elsevier Emergency},
  pages     = {38 -- 45},
  year      = {2021},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{BusseKernebeckNefetal.2021,
  author    = {Busse, Theresa Sophie and Kernebeck, Sven and Nef, Larissa and Rebacz, Patrick and Kickbusch, Ilona and Ehlers, Jan Peter},
  title     = {Views on Using Social Robots in Professional Caregiving: Content Analysis of a Scenario Method Workshop (Preprint)},
  series = {J Med Internet Res},
  volume    = {23},
  journal   = {J Med Internet Res},
  number    = {11},
  doi       = {10.25974/fhms-17307},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:hbz:836-opus-173072},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {BACKGROUND Interest in digital technologies in the health care sector is growing and can be a way to reduce the burden on professional caregivers while helping people to become more independent. Social robots are regarded as a special form of technology that can be usefully applied in professional caregiving with the potential to focus on interpersonal contact. While implementation is progressing slowly, a debate on the concepts and applications of social robots in future care is necessary. OBJECTIVE In addition to existing studies with a focus on societal attitudes toward social robots, there is a need to understand the views of professional caregivers and patients. This study used desired future scenarios to collate the perspectives of experts and analyze the significance for developing the place of social robots in care. METHODS In February 2020, an expert workshop was held with 88 participants (health professionals and educators; [PhD] students of medicine, health care, professional care, and technology; patient advocates; software developers; government representatives; and research fellows) from Austria, Germany, and Switzerland. Using the scenario methodology, the possibilities of analog professional care (Analog Care), fully robotic professional care (Robotic Care), teams of robots and professional caregivers (Deep Care), and professional caregivers supported by robots (Smart Care) were discussed. The scenarios were used as a stimulus for the development of ideas about future professional caregiving. The discussion was evaluated using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS The majority of the experts were in favor of care in which people are supported by technology (Deep Care) and developed similar scenarios with a focus on dignity-centeredness. The discussions then focused on the steps necessary for its implementation, highlighting a strong need for the development of eHealth competence in society, a change in the training of professional caregivers, and cross-sectoral concepts. The experts also saw user acceptance as crucial to the use of robotics. This involves the acceptance of both professional caregivers and care recipients. CONCLUSIONS The literature review and subsequent workshop revealed how decision-making about the value of social robots depends on personal characteristics related to experience and values. There is therefore a strong need to recognize individual perspectives of care before social robots become an integrated part of care in the future.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Schwermann2021,
  author    = {Schwermann, Meike},
  title     = {Tr{\"o}stende Sorgekultur in Zeiten der Pandemie. W{\"u}rdezentrierte Beziehungsgestaltung wider moralische Verletzbarkeit},
  series = {NOVAcura},
  volume    = {10/21},
  journal   = {NOVAcura},
  issn      = {1662-9027},
  pages     = {32 -- 35},
  year      = {2021},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{BusseJuxKernebecketal.2021,
  author    = {Busse, Theresa Sophie and Jux, Chantal and Kernebeck, Sven and Meister, Sven and Ehlers, Jan P.},
  title     = {Steigerung der Versorgungsqualit{\"a}t in der Palliativversorgung durch elektronische Gesundheitsakten},
  series = {Monitor Versorgungsforschung},
  volume    = {14},
  journal   = {Monitor Versorgungsforschung},
  issn      = {1866-0533},
  doi       = {10.25974/fhms-17303},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:hbz:836-opus-173035},
  pages     = {45 -- 50},
  year      = {2021},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{SchmidtMartin2021,
  author    = {Schmidt, Jennifer and Martin, Alexandra},
  title     = {Smartphone-Apps zur Verbesserung der K{\"o}rperzufriedenheit? Ergebnisse einer randomisierten kontrollierten Pilotstudie zur mobilen „attention-bias modification"},
  series = {Psychotherapeut},
  volume    = {66},
  journal   = {Psychotherapeut},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00278-021-00517-2},
  pages     = {306 -- 313},
  year      = {2021},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Nienaber2021,
  author    = {Nienaber, Andr{\´e}},
  title     = {Rezension Georg Kremer, Michael Schulz: PraxisWissen: Motivierende Gespr{\"a}chsf{\"u}hrung in der Psychiatrie},
  series = {Pflegewissenschaft},
  volume    = {23},
  journal   = {Pflegewissenschaft},
  number    = {03},
  issn      = {1662-3029},
  pages     = {10 -- 11},
  year      = {2021},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Kostorz2021,
  author    = {Kostorz, Peter},
  title     = {Rechtsfragen des Distanzunterrichts an Pflegeschulen},
  series = {Unterricht Pflege},
  volume    = {26},
  journal   = {Unterricht Pflege},
  number    = {4},
  issn      = {1615-1046},
  pages     = {52 -- 55},
  year      = {2021},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{HegeduesBurrPflugeretal.2021,
  author    = {Heged{\"u}s, Anna and Burr, Christian and Pfluger, Viviane and Sieg, Daniel and Nienaber, Andr{\´e} and Schulz, Michael},
  title     = {Peer support worker training: Results of the evaluation of the Experienced Involvement training programme in Switzerland and Germany},
  series = {International Journal of Mental Health Nursing},
  volume    = {30},
  journal   = {International Journal of Mental Health Nursing},
  number    = {2},
  doi       = {10.1111/inm.12805},
  pages     = {451 -- 460},
  year      = {2021},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KernebeckBusseJuxetal.2021,
  author    = {Kernebeck, Sven and Busse, Theresa Sophie and Jux, Chantal and Meyer, Dorothee and Dreier, Larissa Alice and Zenz, Daniel and Zernikow, Boris and Ehlers, Jan Peter},
  title     = {Participatory Design of an Electronic Medical Record for Paediatric Palliative Care: A Think-Aloud Study with Nurses and Physicians},
  series = {Children},
  volume    = {8},
  journal   = {Children},
  issn      = {2227-9067},
  doi       = {10.25974/fhms-17321},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:hbz:836-opus-173219},
  pages     = {695},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Background: Electronic medical records (EMRs) offer a promising approach to mapping and documenting the complex information gathered in paediatric palliative care (PPC). However, if they are not well developed, poorly implemented EMRs have unintended consequences that may cause harm to patients. One approach to preventing such harm is the involvement of users in the participatory design to ensure user acceptance and patient safety. Therefore, the aim of this study is to evaluate the acceptance of a novel patient chart module (PCM) as part of an EMR from the perspective of potential users in PPC and to involve these professionals in the design process. Methods: A qualitative observational study with N = 16 PPC professionals (n = 10 nurses, n = 6 physicians) was conducted, including concurrent think aloud (CTA) and semi-structured interviews. A structured content analysis based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology was applied. Results: The results can be summarized in terms of general observations, performance expectancy, effort expectancy and facilitating conditions, all of which are likely to have a positive influence on acceptance of the PCM from the user perspective in the context of PPC. Conclusions: The involvement of users in the development of EMRs is important for meeting the requirements in PPC. Further software adaptations are necessary to implement these requirements.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BusseJuxKernebecketal.2021,
  author    = {Busse, Theresa Sophie and Jux, Chantal and Kernebeck, Sven and Dreier, Larissa Alice and Meyer, Dorothee and Zenz, Daniel and Zernikow, Boris and Ehlers, Jan Peter},
  title     = {Participatory Design of an Electronic Cross-Facility Health Record (ECHR) System for Pediatric Palliative Care: A Think-Aloud Study},
  series = {Children},
  volume    = {8},
  journal   = {Children},
  issn      = {2227-9067},
  doi       = {10.25974/fhms-17319},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:hbz:836-opus-173191},
  pages     = {839},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Background: Pediatric palliative care (PPC) patients experience years of multisectoral and professional care. An electronic cross-facility health record (ECHR) system can support the immediate exchange of information among PPC professionals. Based on a needs assessment, a prototype ECHR system was developed. Methods: To evaluate potential users' perspective regarding the system, a qualitative observational study was conducted consisting of a concurrent think-aloud session and a semi-structured qualitative interview. Results: Twenty PPC professionals (nurses, physicians) from specialized outpatient PPC teams, a PPC unit, and medical offices rated the ECHR system as a helpful tool to improve the exchange and collection of information, communication between PPC professionals, and treatment planning. From the user's point of view, the basic logic of the ECHR system should be further adapted to improve the interaction of data remirrored from patient records of outpatient and inpatient care with those entered via the system. The users wished for further functions (text search) and content (information on therapies). Some content, such as the treatment process, needs to be further adapted. Conclusion: The developed ECHR system needs to be more specific in some features by offering all available information; while for other features, be less specific to offer a quick overview. The ability to share information promptly and automatically was seen as a tremendous improvement to the quality of care for PPC patients.},
  language  = {en}
}