@article{KostorzKernebeck2015, author = {Kostorz, Peter and Kernebeck, Sven}, title = {20 Jahre soziale Pflegeversicherung - Bilanz und Ausblick}, series = {Wege zur Sozialversicherung}, journal = {Wege zur Sozialversicherung}, issn = {0043-2059}, doi = {10.37307/j.2191-7345.2015.02.03}, pages = {35 -- 41}, year = {2015}, language = {de} } @article{KostorzKernebeck2015, author = {Kostorz, Peter and Kernebeck, Sven}, title = {Unterrichtsentwurf: Demographie und Pflege}, series = {Unterricht Pflege}, journal = {Unterricht Pflege}, number = {1}, issn = {1615-1046}, pages = {8 -- 15}, year = {2015}, language = {de} } @article{KernebeckKostorz2015, author = {Kernebeck, Sven and Kostorz, Peter}, title = {Die Reformagenda der sozialen Pflegeversicherung - Herausforderungen f{\"u}r Politik und Gesellschaft}, series = {Pflegezeitschrift}, journal = {Pflegezeitschrift}, number = {12}, issn = {0945-1129}, pages = {710 -- 714}, year = {2015}, language = {de} } @article{Kernebeck2019, author = {Kernebeck, Sven}, title = {Schmerz und Schmerzmanagement}, series = {NOVAcura}, journal = {NOVAcura}, pages = {1 -- 5}, year = {2019}, language = {de} } @article{KernebeckHollePogschebaetal.2019, author = {Kernebeck, Sven and Holle, Daniela and Pogscheba, Patrick and Jordan, Felix and Mertl, Fabian and Huldtgren, Alina and Bader, Sebastian and Kirste, Thomas and Teipel, Stefan and Holle, Bernhard and Halek, Margareta}, title = {A Tablet App- and Sensor-Based Assistive Technology Intervention for Informal Caregivers to Manage the Challenging Behavior of People With Dementia (the insideDEM Study): Protocol for a Feasibility Study (Preprint)}, series = {JMIR Res Protoc}, volume = {8}, journal = {JMIR Res Protoc}, number = {2}, doi = {10.25974/fhms-17306}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:hbz:836-opus-173061}, year = {2019}, abstract = {BACKGROUND Despite the enormous number of assistive technologies (ATs) in dementia care, the management of challenging behavior (CB) of persons with dementia (PwD) by informal caregivers in home care is widely disregarded. The first-line strategy to manage CB is to support the understanding of the underlying causes of CB to formulate individualized nonpharmacological interventions. App- and sensor-based approaches combining multimodal sensors (actimetry and other modalities) and caregiver information are innovative ways to support the understanding of CB for family caregivers. OBJECTIVE The main aim of this study is to describe the design of a feasibility study consisting of an outcome and a process evaluation of a newly developed app- and sensor-based intervention to manage CB of PwD for family caregivers at home. METHODS In this feasibility study, we perform an outcome and a process evaluation with a pre-post descriptive design over an 8-week intervention period. The Medical Research Council framework guides the design of this feasibility study. The data on 20 dyads (primary caregiver and PwD) are gathered through standardized questionnaires, protocols, and log files as well as semistructured qualitative interviews. The outcome measures (neuropsychiatric inventory and Cohen-Mansfield agitation inventory) are analyzed by using descriptive statistics and statistical tests relevant to the individual assessments (eg, chi-square test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test). For the analysis of the process data, the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology is used. Log files are analyzed by using descriptive statistics, protocols are analyzed by using documentary analysis, and semistructured interviews are analyzed deductively using content analysis. RESULTS The newly developed app- and sensor-based AT has been developed and was evaluated until July in 2018. The recruitment of dyads started in September 2017 and was concluded in March 2018. The data collection was completed at the end of July 2018. CONCLUSIONS This study presents the protocol of the first feasibility study to encompass an outcome and process evaluation to assess a complex app- and sensor-based AT combining multimodal actimetry sensors for informal caregivers to manage CB. The feasibility study will provide in-depth information about the study procedure and on how to optimize the design of the intervention and its delivery. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPOR DERR1-10.2196/11630}, language = {de} } @article{BusseKernebeckDreieretal.2020, author = {Busse, Theresa Sophie and Kernebeck, Sven and Dreier, Larissa and Meyer, Dorothee and Goletz, Graznya and Zenz, D. and Wager, Julia and Zernikow, Boris and Ehlers, Jan Peter}, title = {Nutzung von Mock-ups im Co-Design-Prozess der partizipativen Entwicklung einer station{\"a}ren elektronischen Patient*innenakte f{\"u}r die p{\"a}diatrische Palliativversorgung - ein Erfahrungsbericht}, series = {19. Deutscher Kongress f{\"u}r Versorgungsforschung, Deutsches Netzwerk f{\"u}r Versorgungsforschung e.V, September 2020, online}, journal = {19. Deutscher Kongress f{\"u}r Versorgungsforschung, Deutsches Netzwerk f{\"u}r Versorgungsforschung e.V, September 2020, online}, doi = {10.3205/20dkvf117}, year = {2020}, language = {de} } @article{BusseKernebeckDreieretal.2020, author = {Busse, Theresa Sophie and Kernebeck, Sven and Dreier, Larissa Alicia and Meyer, Dorothee and Goletz, Grazyna and Zenz, Daniel and Wager, Julia and Ehlers, Jan Peter and Zernikow, Boris}, title = {Nutzer*innenzentrierte Entwicklung einer elektronischen Patient*innenakte f{\"u}r die p{\"a}diatrische Palliativversorgung - Ergebnisse von Fokusgruppeninterviews mit Pflegenden im station{\"a}ren Setting.}, series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Palliativmedizin}, volume = {21}, journal = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Palliativmedizin}, number = {5}, doi = {10.1055/s-0040-1714990}, year = {2020}, language = {de} } @article{BusseKernebeckDreieretal.2020, author = {Busse, Theresa Sophie and Kernebeck, Sven and Dreier, Larissa Alicia and Meyer, Dorothee and Goletz, Grazyna and Zenz, Daniel and Zernikow, Boris and Wager, Julia}, title = {Nutzer*innenzentrierte Entwicklung einer digitalen Patient*innenakte in der p{\"a}diatrischen Palliativversorgung.}, year = {2020}, language = {de} } @article{Kernebeck2020, author = {Kernebeck, Sven}, title = {Partizipative Entwicklung von digitalen Technologien - Mit Nutzerinnen und Nutzern gemeinsam digitale Technologien entwickeln}, series = {NOVAcura}, volume = {51}, journal = {NOVAcura}, number = {6}, issn = {1662-9027}, year = {2020}, language = {de} } @article{BusseKernebeckNefetal.2021, author = {Busse, Theresa Sophie and Kernebeck, Sven and Nef, Larissa and Rebacz, Patrick and Kickbusch, Ilona and Ehlers, Jan Peter}, title = {Views on Using Social Robots in Professional Caregiving: Content Analysis of a Scenario Method Workshop (Preprint)}, series = {J Med Internet Res}, volume = {23}, journal = {J Med Internet Res}, number = {11}, doi = {10.25974/fhms-17307}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:hbz:836-opus-173072}, year = {2021}, abstract = {BACKGROUND Interest in digital technologies in the health care sector is growing and can be a way to reduce the burden on professional caregivers while helping people to become more independent. Social robots are regarded as a special form of technology that can be usefully applied in professional caregiving with the potential to focus on interpersonal contact. While implementation is progressing slowly, a debate on the concepts and applications of social robots in future care is necessary. OBJECTIVE In addition to existing studies with a focus on societal attitudes toward social robots, there is a need to understand the views of professional caregivers and patients. This study used desired future scenarios to collate the perspectives of experts and analyze the significance for developing the place of social robots in care. METHODS In February 2020, an expert workshop was held with 88 participants (health professionals and educators; [PhD] students of medicine, health care, professional care, and technology; patient advocates; software developers; government representatives; and research fellows) from Austria, Germany, and Switzerland. Using the scenario methodology, the possibilities of analog professional care (Analog Care), fully robotic professional care (Robotic Care), teams of robots and professional caregivers (Deep Care), and professional caregivers supported by robots (Smart Care) were discussed. The scenarios were used as a stimulus for the development of ideas about future professional caregiving. The discussion was evaluated using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS The majority of the experts were in favor of care in which people are supported by technology (Deep Care) and developed similar scenarios with a focus on dignity-centeredness. The discussions then focused on the steps necessary for its implementation, highlighting a strong need for the development of eHealth competence in society, a change in the training of professional caregivers, and cross-sectoral concepts. The experts also saw user acceptance as crucial to the use of robotics. This involves the acceptance of both professional caregivers and care recipients. CONCLUSIONS The literature review and subsequent workshop revealed how decision-making about the value of social robots depends on personal characteristics related to experience and values. There is therefore a strong need to recognize individual perspectives of care before social robots become an integrated part of care in the future.}, language = {de} }