@article{KernebeckBusseJuxetal.2022,
  author    = {Kernebeck, Sven and Busse, Theresa Sophie and Jux, Chantal and Dreier, Larissa Alice and Meyer, Dorothee and Zenz, Daniel and Zernikow, Boris and Ehlers, Jan Peter},
  title     = {Evaluation of an Electronic Medical Record Module for Nursing Documentation in Paediatric Palliative Care: Involvement of Nurses with a Think-Aloud Approach},
  series = {International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health},
  volume    = {19},
  journal   = {International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health},
  issn      = {1661-7827},
  doi       = {10.25974/fhms-17313},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:hbz:836-opus-173137},
  pages     = {3637},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Background: Paediatric palliative care (PPC) is a noncurative approach to the care of children and adolescents with life-limiting and life-threatening illnesses. Electronic medical records (EMRs) play an important role in documenting such complex processes. Despite their benefits, they can introduce unintended consequences if future users are not involved in their development. Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the acceptance of a novel module for nursing documentation by nurses working in the context of PPC. Methods: An observational study employing concurrent think-aloud and semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 11 nurses working in PPC. Based on the main determinants of the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT), data were analysed using qualitative content analysis. Results: The main determinants of UTAUT were found to potentially influence acceptance of the novel module. Participants perceived the module to be self-explanatory and intuitive. Some adaptations, such as the reduction of fragmentation in the display, the optimization of confusing mouseover fields, and the use of familiar nursing terminology, are reasonable ways of increasing software adoption. Conclusions: After adaptation of the modules based on the results, further evaluation with the participation of future users is required.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{KernebeckJuxBusseetal.2022,
  author    = {Kernebeck, Sven and Jux, Chantal and Busse, Theresa Sophie and Meyer, Dorothee and Dreier, Larissa Alice and Zenz, Daniel and Zernikow, Boris and Ehlers, Jan Peter},
  title     = {Participatory Design of a Medication Module in an Electronic Medical Record for Paediatric Palliative Care: A Think-Aloud Approach with Nurses and Physicians},
  series = {Children},
  volume    = {9},
  journal   = {Children},
  issn      = {2227-9067},
  doi       = {10.25974/fhms-17314},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:hbz:836-opus-173146},
  pages     = {82},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Background: Electronic medical records (EMRs) play a key role in improving documentation and quality of care in paediatric palliative care (PPC). Inadequate EMR design can cause incorrect prescription and administration of medications. Due to the fact of complex diseases and the resulting high level of medical complexity, patients in PPC are vulnerable to medication errors. Consequently, involving users in the development process is important. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the acceptance of a medication module from the perspective of potential users in PPC and to involve them in the development process. Methods: A qualitative observational study was conducted with 10 nurses and four physicians using a concurrent think-aloud protocol and semi-structured qualitative interviews. A qualitative content analysis was applied based on a unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Results: Requirements from the user's perspective could be identified as possible influences on acceptance and actual use. Requirements were grouped into the categories "performance expectancies" and "effort expectancies". Conclusions: The results serve as a basis for further development. Attention should be given to the reduction of display fragmentation, as it decreases cognitive load. Further approaches to evaluation should be taken.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{KernebeckJuxBusseetal.2022,
  author    = {Kernebeck, Sven and Jux, Chantal and Busse, Theresa Sophie and Meyer, Dorothee and Dreier, Larissa Alice and Zenz, Daniel and Zernikow, Boris and Ehlers, Jan Peter},
  title     = {Participatory Design of a Medication Module in an Electronic Medical Record for Paediatric Palliative Care: A Think-Aloud Approach with Nurses and Physicians},
  series = {Children},
  volume    = {9},
  journal   = {Children},
  issn      = {2227-9067},
  doi       = {10.25974/fhms-17315},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:hbz:836-opus-173158},
  pages     = {82},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Background: Electronic medical records (EMRs) play a key role in improving documentation and quality of care in paediatric palliative care (PPC). Inadequate EMR design can cause incorrect prescription and administration of medications. Due to the fact of complex diseases and the resulting high level of medical complexity, patients in PPC are vulnerable to medication errors. Consequently, involving users in the development process is important. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the acceptance of a medication module from the perspective of potential users in PPC and to involve them in the development process. Methods: A qualitative observational study was conducted with 10 nurses and four physicians using a concurrent think-aloud protocol and semi-structured qualitative interviews. A qualitative content analysis was applied based on a unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Results: Requirements from the user's perspective could be identified as possible influences on acceptance and actual use. Requirements were grouped into the categories "performance expectancies" and "effort expectancies". Conclusions: The results serve as a basis for further development. Attention should be given to the reduction of display fragmentation, as it decreases cognitive load. Further approaches to evaluation should be taken.},
  language  = {de}
}