@inproceedings{Kernebeck2016,
  author    = {Kernebeck, Sven},
  title     = {„Zwischen Hi-Tech und Bedarfsgerechtigkeit" - Technologien zur Versorgung von Menschen mit Demenz in der H{\"a}uslichkeit.},
  series = {Tagung des Demenz-Servicezentrums Region M{\"u}nster und das westliche M{\"u}nsterland und des Netzwerk Gesundheitswirtschaft M{\"u}nsterland e.V., September 2016, M{\"u}nster},
  booktitle = {Tagung des Demenz-Servicezentrums Region M{\"u}nster und das westliche M{\"u}nsterland und des Netzwerk Gesundheitswirtschaft M{\"u}nsterland e.V., September 2016, M{\"u}nster},
  year      = {2016},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{Kernebeck2016,
  author    = {Kernebeck, Sven},
  title     = {„Technology is a word that describes something that doesn´t work yet." (Douglas Adams) - Technologien im Leben von Menschen mit Demenz.},
  series = {Vortrag auf der Fachtagung des Forum Demenz im Kreis Viersen - „Das kann ja heiter werden Visionen f{\"u}r's Alter, Viersen},
  journal   = {Vortrag auf der Fachtagung des Forum Demenz im Kreis Viersen - „Das kann ja heiter werden Visionen f{\"u}r's Alter, Viersen},
  year      = {2016},
  language  = {de}
}
@inproceedings{KernebeckRedaelliKrameretal.2019,
  author    = {Kernebeck, Sven and Redaelli, Marcus and Kramer, Ursula and Vollmar, Horst Christian},
  title     = {Wie sollen digitale Gesundheitsanwendungen durch die Versorgungsforschung evaluiert werden?},
  series = {18. Deutscher Kongress f{\"u}r Versorgungsforschung (DKVF). Berlin, 09.-11.10.2019},
  booktitle = {18. Deutscher Kongress f{\"u}r Versorgungsforschung (DKVF). Berlin, 09.-11.10.2019},
  doi       = {10.3205/19dkvf029},
  year      = {2019},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{NitscheBusseKernebecketal.2022,
  author    = {Nitsche, Julia and Busse, Theresa Sophie and Kernebeck, Sven and Ehlers, Jan P.},
  title     = {Virtual Classrooms and Their Challenge of Interaction—An Evaluation of Chat Activities and Logs in an Online Course about Digital Medicine with Heterogeneous Participants},
  series = {International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health},
  volume    = {19},
  journal   = {International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health},
  issn      = {1661-7827},
  doi       = {10.25974/fhms-17308},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:hbz:836-opus-173083},
  pages     = {10184},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Learning digital competencies can be successful if the information is also tried out immediately using interactive elements. However, interactive teaching poses a particular challenge, especially in large group formats. Various strategies are used to promote interaction, but there is little known about the results. This article shows different strategies and evaluates their influence on the interaction rate in a large group course over two terms that teaches digital medicine. Log files and participation in surveys as well as participation in chat were quantitatively evaluated. In addition, the chat messages themselves were evaluated qualitatively. For the evaluation, relation to the total number of participants was particularly relevant in order to be able to determine an interaction rate in the individual course sessions. A maximum average interaction rate of 90.97\% could be determined over the entire term while the participants wrote an average of 3.96 comments during a session in the chat. In summary, this research could show that interactive elements should be well planned and used at regular intervals in order to reap the benefits.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{BusseKernebeckNefetal.2021,
  author    = {Busse, Theresa Sophie and Kernebeck, Sven and Nef, Larissa and Rebacz, Patrick and Kickbusch, Ilona and Ehlers, Jan Peter},
  title     = {Views on Using Social Robots in Professional Caregiving: Content Analysis of a Scenario Method Workshop (Preprint)},
  series = {J Med Internet Res},
  volume    = {23},
  journal   = {J Med Internet Res},
  number    = {11},
  doi       = {10.25974/fhms-17307},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:hbz:836-opus-173072},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {BACKGROUND Interest in digital technologies in the health care sector is growing and can be a way to reduce the burden on professional caregivers while helping people to become more independent. Social robots are regarded as a special form of technology that can be usefully applied in professional caregiving with the potential to focus on interpersonal contact. While implementation is progressing slowly, a debate on the concepts and applications of social robots in future care is necessary. OBJECTIVE In addition to existing studies with a focus on societal attitudes toward social robots, there is a need to understand the views of professional caregivers and patients. This study used desired future scenarios to collate the perspectives of experts and analyze the significance for developing the place of social robots in care. METHODS In February 2020, an expert workshop was held with 88 participants (health professionals and educators; [PhD] students of medicine, health care, professional care, and technology; patient advocates; software developers; government representatives; and research fellows) from Austria, Germany, and Switzerland. Using the scenario methodology, the possibilities of analog professional care (Analog Care), fully robotic professional care (Robotic Care), teams of robots and professional caregivers (Deep Care), and professional caregivers supported by robots (Smart Care) were discussed. The scenarios were used as a stimulus for the development of ideas about future professional caregiving. The discussion was evaluated using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS The majority of the experts were in favor of care in which people are supported by technology (Deep Care) and developed similar scenarios with a focus on dignity-centeredness. The discussions then focused on the steps necessary for its implementation, highlighting a strong need for the development of eHealth competence in society, a change in the training of professional caregivers, and cross-sectoral concepts. The experts also saw user acceptance as crucial to the use of robotics. This involves the acceptance of both professional caregivers and care recipients. CONCLUSIONS The literature review and subsequent workshop revealed how decision-making about the value of social robots depends on personal characteristics related to experience and values. There is therefore a strong need to recognize individual perspectives of care before social robots become an integrated part of care in the future.},
  language  = {de}
}
@inproceedings{BusseKernebeckMeyeretal.2020,
  author    = {Busse, Theresa Sophie and Kernebeck, Sven and Meyer, Dorothee and Dreier, Larissa and Goletz, Grazyna and Zenz, Daniel and Ehlers, Jan Peter and Wager, Julia and Zernikow, Boris},
  title     = {Verbesserung der Gesundheitsversorgung in der p{\"a}diatrischen Palliativversorgung durch Digitalisierung im partizipativen Entwicklungs- und Forschungsprojekt ELSA-PP zur Entwicklung eines elektronischen sektoren{\"u}bergreifenden Aktensystems},
  series = {19. Deutscher Kongress f{\"u}r Versorgungsforschung, 30.09. - 01.10.2020, digital},
  booktitle = {19. Deutscher Kongress f{\"u}r Versorgungsforschung, 30.09. - 01.10.2020, digital},
  doi       = {10.3205/20dkvf435},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {de}
}
@inproceedings{KernebeckBusseMeyeretal.2020,
  author    = {Kernebeck, Sven and Busse, Theresa Sophie and Meyer, Dorothee and Dreier, Larissa and Wager, Julia and Zernikow, Boris and Ehlers, Jen Peter},
  title     = {User-Centered Design und User Co-Design aus Perspektive der Versorgungsforschung - Methodische Herausforderungen bei der Evaluation von Nutzer*innenbed{\"u}rfnissen an eine Elektronische Patient*innenakte in der station{\"a}ren p{\"a}diartrischen Palliativversorgung},
  series = {19. Deutscher Kongress f{\"u}r Versorgungsforschung, 30.09. - 01.10.2020, digital},
  booktitle = {19. Deutscher Kongress f{\"u}r Versorgungsforschung, 30.09. - 01.10.2020, digital},
  doi       = {10.3205/20dkvf351},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{KornBoettcherBusseetal.2022,
  author    = {Korn, Sandra and B{\"o}ttcher, Maximilian David and Busse, Theresa Sophie and Kernebeck, Sven and Breucha, Michael and Ehlers, Jan and Kahlert, Christoph and Weitz, J{\"u}rgen and Bork, Ulrich},
  title     = {Use and Perception of Digital Health Technologies by Surgical Patients in Germany in the Pre-COVID-19 Era: Survey Study},
  series = {JMIR Formative Research},
  volume    = {6},
  journal   = {JMIR Formative Research},
  doi       = {10.25974/fhms-17304},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:hbz:836-opus-173046},
  pages     = {e33985},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {This survey study investigates surgical patients' use and perception of digital health technologies in Germany in the pre-COVID-19 era. The objective of this study was to relate surgical patients' characteristics to the use and perception of several digital health technologies. In this single-center, cross-sectional survey study in the outpatient department of a university hospital in Germany, 406 patients completed a questionnaire with the following three domains: general information and use of the internet, smartphones, and general digital health aspects. Analyses were stratified by age group and highest education level achieved. We found significant age-based differences in most of the evaluated aspects. Younger patients were more open to using new technologies in private and medical settings but had more security concerns. Although searching for information on illnesses on the web was common, the overall acceptance of and trust in web-based consultations were rather low, with <50\% of patients in each age group reporting acceptance and trust. More people with academic qualifications than without academic qualifications searched for information on the web before visiting physicians (73/121, 60.3\% and 100/240, 41.7\%, respectively). Patients with academic degrees were also more engaged in health-related information and communication technology use. These results support the need for eHealth literacy, health literacy, and available digital devices and internet access to support the active, meaningful use of information and communication technologies in health care. Uncertainties and a lack of knowledge exist, especially regarding telemedicine and the use of medical and health apps. This is especially pronounced among older patients and patients with a low education status.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{KostorzKernebeck2015,
  author    = {Kostorz, Peter and Kernebeck, Sven},
  title     = {Unterrichtsentwurf: Demographie und Pflege},
  series = {Unterricht Pflege},
  journal   = {Unterricht Pflege},
  number    = {1},
  issn      = {1615-1046},
  pages     = {8 -- 15},
  year      = {2015},
  language  = {de}
}
@inproceedings{BusseKernebeckNefetal.2020,
  author    = {Busse, Theresa Sophie and Kernebeck, Sven and Nef, Larissa and Kickbusch, Ilona and Ehlers, Jan P.},
  title     = {Talk to me - Soziale Roboter im Gesundheitswesen.},
  series = {Report Careum Dialog 2020},
  booktitle = {Report Careum Dialog 2020},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {de}
}