@article{BeierleinBultmannMoelleretal.2017, author = {Beierlein, Volker and Bultmann, Johanna Christine and M{\"o}ller, Birgit and Klitzing, Kai and Flechtner, Hans-Henning and Resch, Franz and Herzog, Wolfgang and Br{\"a}hler, Elmar and F{\"u}hrer, Daniel and Romer, Georg and Koch, Uwe and Bergelt, Corinna}, title = {Measuring family functioning in families with parental cancer: Reliability and validity of the German adaptation of the Family Assessment Device (FAD)}, series = {Journal of psychosomatic research}, volume = {93}, journal = {Journal of psychosomatic research}, doi = {10.1016/j.jpsychores.2016.11.007}, pages = {110 -- 117}, year = {2017}, abstract = {OBJECTIVE The concept of family functioning is gaining importance in psycho-oncology research and health care services. The Family Assessment Device (FAD) is a well-established measure of family functioning. Psychometric properties inherent in the German 51-item adaptation of the FAD are examined in different samples of families with parental cancer. METHODS Acceptance, reliability, and validity of FAD scales are analysed in samples from different study settings (N=1701 cancer patients, N=261 partners, N=158 dependent adolescent children 11 to 18years old). RESULTS Missing items in the FAD scales (acceptance) are rare for adults (<1.1\%) and adolescent children (<4.4\%). In samples of adults and older adolescents (15 to 18years), all FAD scales except for the Roles scale are significantly reliable (0.75≤Cronbach's α≤0.88). The scales correlate highly (0.46≤Pearson's r≤0.59) with the criterion satisfaction with family life (convergent validity), and have smaller correlations (0.16≤r≤0.49) with measures of emotional distress and subjective well-being (divergent validity). In most FAD scales, adults seeking family counselling report worse family functioning (0.24≤Cohen's d≤0.59) than adults in other samples with parental cancer (discriminative validity). CONCLUSION Overall, the German 51-item adaptation of the FAD reveals good acceptance, reliability, and validity for cancer patients and their relatives. Particularly the scale General Functioning shows excellent psychometric properties. The FAD is suitable in the assessment of families with parental cancer for adults and adolescents older than 11years.}, subject = {Adolescent}, language = {en} } @article{KrattenmacherKuehneFuehreretal.2012, author = {Krattenmacher, Thomas and K{\"u}hne, Franziska and F{\"u}hrer, Daniel and Ernst, Johanna and Br{\"a}hler, Elmar and Herzog, Wolfgang and Klitzing, Kai and Flechtner, Hans-Henning and Bergelt, Corinna and Romer, Georg and M{\"o}ller, Birgit}, title = {Kinder krebskranker Eltern - elterliches Coping, famili{\"a}res Funktionsniveau und psychosoziale Anpassung der Kinder}, series = {Praxis der Kinderpsychologie und Kinderpsychiatrie}, volume = {61}, journal = {Praxis der Kinderpsychologie und Kinderpsychiatrie}, issn = {0032-7034}, doi = {10.13109/prkk.2012.61.6.447}, pages = {447 -- 462}, year = {2012}, abstract = {Children exposed to parental cancer have an increased risk of mental health problems. However, the parental illness itself and its features do not predict children's psychological adjustment. Parent- and family-related factors are more predictive for children's well-being and the incidence of psychopathological symptoms, respectively. This study focuses on parental ways of coping with illness from both, the ill and healthy parent's perspective, and the relationship with family functioning and children's adjustment. Results show a significant impact of parental coping styles on children's health-related quality of life and psychopathological symptoms and, furthermore, that this relationship is mediated by aspects of family functioning. This study support the importance of family systems approaches. Implications for further studies and practical issues are discussed.}, subject = {Adaptation}, language = {de} } @article{MoellerBarkmannKrattenmacheretal.2014, author = {M{\"o}ller, Birgit and Barkmann, Claus and Krattenmacher, Thomas and K{\"u}hne, Franziska and Bergelt, Corinna and Beierlein, Volker and Ernst, Johanna and Br{\"a}hler, Elmar and Flechtner, Hans-Henning and Herzog, Wolfgang and Klitzing, Kai and F{\"u}hrer, Daniel and Resch, Franz and Romer, Georg}, title = {Children of cancer patients: prevalence and predictors of emotional and behavioral problems}, series = {Cancer}, volume = {120}, journal = {Cancer}, doi = {10.1002/cncr.28644}, pages = {2361 -- 2370}, year = {2014}, abstract = {BACKGROUND Children of patients with cancer are at increased risk for developing emotional and behavioral problems. This study explored the prevalence and predictors of emotional and behavioral problems in Children of cancer patients in a multisite research project. METHODS A cross-sectional sample of N = 235 families was recruited simultaneously in 5 university medical centers. The participants, including parents (N = 402) and children (N = 324; ages 11-21 years) completed standardized questionnaires. Emotional and behavioral problems in children were measured by the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). On the basis of previous research and using a mixed-model approach, child-, parent-, family- and cancer-related variables were examined in addition to socioeconomic status as potential predictors. Descriptive statistics and a multiple random coefficient model were used in the analyses. RESULTS Compared to norms, Children of cancer patients show increased mean levels of emotional and behavioral symptoms. The best predictor of emotional and behavioral problems from the perspectives of the child, the healthy parent, and the ill parent was general family dysfunction. Although family dysfunction was identified as the main predictor, the analysis revealed that the main part of variance was related to the individual child's level. CONCLUSIONS The results indicate that screening for child mental health problems and family dysfunction in oncological and psychosocial treatment units can identify the families most in need of psychosocial support. Psychological services need to be both family-oriented and child-centered and focus on family dysfunction to prevent mental health problems in children.}, subject = {Adolescent}, language = {en} }