@article{WrightTroppMazziotta2017,
  author    = {Wright, Stephen C. and Tropp, Linda R. and Mazziotta, Agostino},
  title     = {Contact between groups, peace, and conflict},
  series = {Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology},
  volume    = {23},
  journal   = {Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology},
  doi       = {10.1037/pac0000273},
  pages     = {207 -- 209},
  year      = {2017},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{InhesternBeierleinBultmannetal.2017,
  author    = {Inhestern, Laura and Beierlein, Volker and Bultmann, Johanna Christine and M{\"o}ller, Birgit and Romer, Georg and Koch, Uwe and Bergelt, Corinna},
  title     = {Anxiety and depression in working-age cancer survivors: a register-based study},
  series = {BMC cancer},
  volume    = {17},
  journal   = {BMC cancer},
  doi       = {10.1186/s12885-017-3347-9},
  pages     = {347},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {BACKGROUND Anxiety and depression can be a long-term strain in cancer survivors. Little is known about the emotional situation of cancer survivors who have to deal with work- and family-related issues. The purpose of this study was to investigate anxiety and depression in working-age cancer survivors and associated factors. METHODS A register-based sample of 3370 cancer survivors (25 to 55 years at time of diagnosis) diagnosed up to six years prior to the survey was recruited from two German cancer registries. Demographic and medical characteristics as well as self-reported measures were used. RESULTS Overall, approximately 40\% of the survivors reported moderate to high anxiety scores and approximately 20\% reported moderate to high depression scores. Compared to the general population, working-age cancer survivors were more anxious but less depressed (p < .001). Subgroups with regard to time since diagnosis did not differ in anxiety or depression. Anxiety and depression in cancer survivors were associated with various variables. Better social support, family functioning and physical health were associated with lower anxiety and depression. CONCLUSIONS Overall, we found higher anxiety levels in cancer survivors of working-age than in the general population. A considerable portion of cancer survivors reported moderate to high levels of anxiety and depression. The results indicate the need for psychosocial screening and psycho-oncological support e.g. in survivorship programs for working-age cancer survivors. Assessing the physical health, social support and family background might help to identify survivors at risk for higher emotional distress.},
  subject      = {Adaptation},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BeierleinBultmannMoelleretal.2017,
  author    = {Beierlein, Volker and Bultmann, Johanna Christine and M{\"o}ller, Birgit and Klitzing, Kai and Flechtner, Hans-Henning and Resch, Franz and Herzog, Wolfgang and Br{\"a}hler, Elmar and F{\"u}hrer, Daniel and Romer, Georg and Koch, Uwe and Bergelt, Corinna},
  title     = {Measuring family functioning in families with parental cancer: Reliability and validity of the German adaptation of the Family Assessment Device (FAD)},
  series = {Journal of psychosomatic research},
  volume    = {93},
  journal   = {Journal of psychosomatic research},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.jpsychores.2016.11.007},
  pages     = {110 -- 117},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {OBJECTIVE The concept of family functioning is gaining importance in psycho-oncology research and health care services. The Family Assessment Device (FAD) is a well-established measure of family functioning. Psychometric properties inherent in the German 51-item adaptation of the FAD are examined in different samples of families with parental cancer. METHODS Acceptance, reliability, and validity of FAD scales are analysed in samples from different study settings (N=1701 cancer patients, N=261 partners, N=158 dependent adolescent children 11 to 18years old). RESULTS Missing items in the FAD scales (acceptance) are rare for adults (<1.1\%) and adolescent children (<4.4\%). In samples of adults and older adolescents (15 to 18years), all FAD scales except for the Roles scale are significantly reliable (0.75≤Cronbach's α≤0.88). The scales correlate highly (0.46≤Pearson's r≤0.59) with the criterion satisfaction with family life (convergent validity), and have smaller correlations (0.16≤r≤0.49) with measures of emotional distress and subjective well-being (divergent validity). In most FAD scales, adults seeking family counselling report worse family functioning (0.24≤Cohen's d≤0.59) than adults in other samples with parental cancer (discriminative validity). CONCLUSION Overall, the German 51-item adaptation of the FAD reveals good acceptance, reliability, and validity for cancer patients and their relatives. Particularly the scale General Functioning shows excellent psychometric properties. The FAD is suitable in the assessment of families with parental cancer for adults and adolescents older than 11years.},
  subject      = {Adolescent},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{GentileBaileyBavelieretal.2017,
  author    = {Gentile, D. A. and Bailey, K. and Bavelier, D. and Brockmyer, J. F. and Cash, H. and Coyne, S. M. and Young, K.},
  title     = {Internet Gaming Disorder in Children and Adolescents},
  series = {Pediatrics},
  journal   = {Pediatrics},
  doi       = {10.1542/peds.2016-1758H},
  pages     = {81 -- 85},
  year      = {2017},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KliemLohmannKlattetal.2017,
  author    = {Kliem, S. and Lohmann, A. and Klatt, T. and M{\"o}ßle, T. and Rehbein, F. and Hinz, A. and Br{\"a}hler, E.},
  title     = {Brief assessment of subjective health complaints: Development, validation and population norms of a brief form of the Giessen Subjective Complaints List (GBB-8)},
  series = {Journal of Psychosomatic Research},
  journal   = {Journal of Psychosomatic Research},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.02.003},
  pages     = {33 -- 43},
  year      = {2017},
  language  = {en}
}