@incollection{Buchholz2014, author = {Buchholz, Wolfgang}, title = {Borderless business - Bridging the gaps between fairly contrastive management concepts}, series = {Baaken, T./Teczke, J. [Edit.]: Managing Disruption and Destabilisation}, booktitle = {Baaken, T./Teczke, J. [Edit.]: Managing Disruption and Destabilisation}, publisher = {International Management Foundation}, address = {Cracow}, isbn = {978-3-938137-49-9}, pages = {143 -- 156}, year = {2014}, language = {en} } @article{BuchholzBach1998, author = {Buchholz, Wolfgang and Bach, Norbert}, title = {Innovatie, Proces of Project?}, series = {"PEM" (De beste Artikelen uit de buitenlandse Vaktijdschriften)}, journal = {"PEM" (De beste Artikelen uit de buitenlandse Vaktijdschriften)}, number = {2}, pages = {57 -- 65}, year = {1998}, language = {en} } @misc{BuchholzCronedeBie2011, author = {Buchholz, Wolfgang and Crone, Niklas and de Bie, Holger}, title = {Changing the Value Chain - Conceptional Framework and Case Studies for In- and Outsourcing Strategies, EIASM Colloquium on Organisational Change and Development - Advances, Challenges and Development, Malta 2011}, year = {2011}, language = {en} } @techreport{BuchholzdeBie2020, type = {Working Paper}, author = {Buchholz, Wolfgang and de Bie, Holger}, title = {A Paradigm Shift in Times of Digital Transformation: What are the Determinants of Bank-Fintech Cooperation? Empirical Evidence from the Financial Service Sector}, pages = {18}, year = {2020}, abstract = {The financial services sector is undergoing a digital transformation. But the emerging picture is very different from the innovation-driven revolution that was initially expected. Due to the variety of challenges, banks and mostly young financial technology companies (fintechs) are increasingly cooperating instead of competing. Yet despite the rapidly growing importance of bank-fintech cooperation, there is still a lack of empirical evidence on the determinants. We use an explorative research design and conduct semi-structured interviews to contribute to this research field. Our findings illustrate that banks are primarily concerned with access to innovation, while fintechs mainly focus on balancing their resource constraints.}, language = {en} } @techreport{BuchholzdeBie2020, type = {Working Paper}, author = {Buchholz, Wolfgang and de Bie, Holger}, title = {Managing the Supply-Side of Digital Platforms: First Insights from the Financial Services Sector}, pages = {19}, year = {2020}, abstract = {The aim of this paper is to contribute knowledge on the interface and relationship be-tween digital platforms in the financial services sector and the service providers on its supply-side. Based on an explorative research design with literature research and three expert interviews, we examine the categories of service providers that can be distin-guished, the factors of influence that are relevant for selecting service providers, and the main benefits and risks for partnerships with service providers. The results are a starting point for deeper investigation and the creation of research questions for future projects in other industries.}, language = {en} } @incollection{BuchholzDeBie2021, author = {Buchholz, Wolfgang and De Bie, Holger}, title = {Managing the Supply-side of Digital Platforms: Framework, Categorisation and Selection of Complementors for Industrial IoT- and Financial Services Platforms}, series = {Supply Management Research: Aktuelle Forschungsergebnisse 2021 (Advanced Studies in Supply Management) / Hrsg. Christof Bode}, booktitle = {Supply Management Research: Aktuelle Forschungsergebnisse 2021 (Advanced Studies in Supply Management) / Hrsg. Christof Bode}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-658-35448-0}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-658-35449-7}, publisher = {FH M{\"u}nster - University of Applied Sciences}, pages = {233 -- 256}, year = {2021}, abstract = {In the so-called ecosystem economy, new platform-based business models evolve rapidly based on the prospects of digital technology. Thus far, little research has been conducted on the supply side of digital platforms which also explains the lack of empirical evidence. We develop a framework, categorise complementors, and analyse the main factors of influence for the evaluation and selection of complementors. For our analysis, we consider both industrial IoT platforms as well as financial services platforms. In addition, we use an explorative research design and conduct semi-structured interviews to contribute to this research field. Top-level managers of digi-tal platforms in both industries were interviewed as experts. In addition, the study also considered secondary data to increases the overall reliability and validity in terms of triangulation. As a result, our study reveals both a number of similarities and differences with regard to complementor management for industrial IoT- and financial services platforms.}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{BuchholzDeBie2021, author = {Buchholz, Wolfgang and De Bie, Holger}, title = {Complementor relationship management for Data-driven B2B platforms: Towards a Holistic approach}, series = {International Forum on Knowledge Asset Dynamics 2021 conference proceedings}, booktitle = {International Forum on Knowledge Asset Dynamics 2021 conference proceedings}, pages = {1 -- 25}, year = {2021}, abstract = {In the so-called ecosystem economy, new platform-based business models evolve rapidly based on the prospects of digital technology. Especially in the B2B context, data-driven platforms are highly relevant. Thus far, little research has been conducted on the supply side of data-driven platforms and especially on service providers, the so-called complementors. Therefore, this paper offers insights into the various facets of complementor relationship management (CoRM). The paper aims to develop a framework for the management of complementors of data-driven B2B platforms. For empirical evidence, we draw on 14 semi-structured expert interviews with platform managers and complementors. The findings outline two big areas of CoRM and discuss distinct characteristics of partner management and technology management. For partner management the differentiation into open and closed platform needs to be taken into account for complementor relationship management. Moreover, our study reveals the key factors of technology management which lead from platform infrastructure to digital applications like digital twins or predictive maintenance.}, language = {en} } @misc{BuchholzdeBieBach2014, author = {Buchholz, Wolfgang and de Bie, Holger and Bach, Norbert}, title = {Rationales and Industry Differences of Concurrent Sourcing in the German Agricultural and Chemical Industry. 23rd Annual International Purchasing and Supply Education and Research Association (IPSERA) Conference: "Purchasing and Supply Management in Difficult Times - The Sky is the Limit". Pretoria, S{\"u}dafrika. 13.-16. April 2014}, year = {2014}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{BuchholzDeBieKochendoerfer2021, author = {Buchholz, Wolfgang and De Bie, Holger and Kochend{\"o}rfer, Ralph}, title = {Managing the supply side of platforms: How does complementor management work for data-driven B2B platforms?}, series = {IPSERA conference proceedings}, booktitle = {IPSERA conference proceedings}, pages = {1 -- 22}, year = {2021}, abstract = {In the so-called ecosystem economy, new platform-based business models evolve rap-idly based on the prospects of digital technology. In the B2B context especially, data-driven platforms are highly relevant. Thus far, little research has been conducted on service providers, the so-called complementors of data-driven platforms. Therefore, this paper represents just a starting point for gaining deeper insights into the different facets of complementor management. For empirical evidence, we draw on semi-structured expert interviews with platform managers. The findings outline the distinct characteristics of open and closed platforms which need to be taken into account for complementor management. Moreover, the paper reveals a number of differences in managing suppliers compared to managing complementors. In addition, our study shows that the key factors influencing complementor management include platform openness, partnership intensity, strategic fit, and market structure respectively poten-tial.}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{BuchholzDeBieKochendoerfer2021, author = {Buchholz, Wolfgang and De Bie, Holger and Kochend{\"o}rfer, Ralph}, title = {Supply Side of Data-Driven B2B Platforms: A Complementors' Perspective}, series = {28th EurOMA conference: Managing the "new normal": The future of Operations and Supply Chain Management in unprecedented times conference proceedings}, booktitle = {28th EurOMA conference: Managing the "new normal": The future of Operations and Supply Chain Management in unprecedented times conference proceedings}, pages = {1 -- 13}, year = {2021}, abstract = {Innovative business models for data-driven B2B platforms evolve rapidly based on the prospects of digital technology. In addition to the platform provider, service providers on the supply side of the digital platform - the so-called complementors - play an important role in the process of value creation. This paper highlights the complementors' perspective on the different facets of complementor relationship management (CoRM) and answers the following research questions: From the perspective of a complementor, what are the main fields of CoRM for data-driven B2B platforms? What factors of influence comprise the reason complementors join a platform?}, language = {en} }