@article{BueckerHotiRose2024,
  author    = {B{\"u}cker, Michael and Hoti, Kreshnik and Rose, Olaf},
  title     = {Artificial intelligence to assist decision-making on pharmacotherapy: A feasibility study},
  series = {Exploratory Research in Clinical and Social Pharmacy},
  volume    = {15},
  journal   = {Exploratory Research in Clinical and Social Pharmacy},
  issn      = {2667-2766},
  doi       = {10.25974/fhms-18142},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:hbz:836-opus-181429},
  pages     = {100491 -- 100491},
  year      = {2024},
  abstract  = {Background Artificial intelligence (AI) has the capability to analyze vast amounts of data and has been applied in various healthcare sectors. However, its effectiveness in aiding pharmacotherapy decision-making remains uncertain due to the intricate, patient-specific, and dynamic nature of this field. Objective This study sought to investigate the potential of AI in guiding pharmacotherapy decisions using clinical data such as diagnoses, laboratory results, and vital signs obtained from routine patient care. Methods Data of a previous study on medication therapy optimization was updated and adapted for the purpose of this study. Analysis was conducted using R software along with the tidymodels extension packages. The dataset was split into 74\% for training and 26\% for testing. Decision trees were selected as the primary model due to their simplicity, transparency, and interpretability. To prevent overfitting, bootstrapping techniques were employed, and hyperparameters were fine-tuned. Performance metrics such as areas under the curve and accuracies were computed. Results The study cohort comprised 101 elderly patients with multiple diagnoses and complex medication regimens. The AI model demonstrated prediction accuracies ranging from 38\% to 100\% for various cardiovascular drug classes. Laboratory data and vital signs could not be interpreted, as the effect and dependence were unclear for the model. The study revealed that the issue of AI lag time in responding to sudden changes could be addressed by manually adjusting decision trees, a task not feasible with neural networks. Conclusion In conclusion, the AI model exhibited promise in recommending appropriate medications for individual patients. While the study identified several obstacles during model development, most were successfully resolved. Future AI studies need to include the drug effect, not only the drug, if laboratory data is part of the decision. This could assist with interpreting their potential relationship. Human oversight and intervention remain essential for an AI-driven pharmacotherapy decision support system to ensure safe and effective patient care.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Rupprecht2023,
  author    = {Rupprecht, Manuel},
  title     = {Geldpolitik: Konsequent handeln!},
  series = {Wirtschaftsdienst},
  volume    = {103},
  journal   = {Wirtschaftsdienst},
  number    = {3},
  issn      = {0043-6275},
  doi       = {10.25974/fhms-16216},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:hbz:836-opus-162165},
  pages     = {154 -- 154},
  year      = {2023},
  language  = {de}
}