@inproceedings{StahmannSchweigertSellemann2013,
  author    = {Stahmann, A and Schweigert, H and Sellemann, B},
  title     = {Welche Rolle kann die Medizinische Informatik bei der Entwicklung eines speziellen AAL-Studiendesigns einnehmen?},
  series = {58. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft f{\"u}r Medizinische Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie e.V. (GMDS). L{\"u}beck, 01. - 05.09.2013.},
  booktitle = {58. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft f{\"u}r Medizinische Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie e.V. (GMDS). L{\"u}beck, 01. - 05.09.2013.},
  publisher = {German Medical Science GMS Publishing House},
  address   = {D{\"u}sseldorf},
  year      = {2013},
  language  = {de}
}
@inproceedings{FreySellemannHuebner2007,
  author    = {Frey, A and Sellemann, B and H{\"u}bner, U},
  title     = {Was zeichnet Innovatoren im Bereich EPA aus?},
  series = {Kongress Medizin und Gesellschaft 2007 - Programm-und Abstractband, 17 - 21 September 2007, Augsburg / Wichmann H-E, Nowak D, Zapf A (Hg.)},
  booktitle = {Kongress Medizin und Gesellschaft 2007 - Programm-und Abstractband, 17 - 21 September 2007, Augsburg / Wichmann H-E, Nowak D, Zapf A (Hg.)},
  pages     = {146 -- 147},
  year      = {2007},
  language  = {de}
}
@inproceedings{Sellemann2014,
  author    = {Sellemann, B},
  title     = {Voraussetzungen f{\"u}r den Routineeinsatz pflegerischer Klassifikationssysteme in der Versorgung. GMDS 2014.},
  series = {59. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft f{\"u}r Medizinische Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie e.V. (GMDS). G{\"o}ttingen, 07.-10.09.2014.},
  booktitle = {59. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft f{\"u}r Medizinische Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie e.V. (GMDS). G{\"o}ttingen, 07.-10.09.2014.},
  publisher = {German Medical Science GMS Publishing House},
  address   = {D{\"u}sseldorf},
  doi       = {10.3205/14gmds255},
  pages     = {DocAbstr. 51},
  year      = {2014},
  language  = {de}
}
@inproceedings{SellemannHuebner2008,
  author    = {Sellemann, Bj{\"o}rn and H{\"u}bner, Ursula},
  title     = {Suchst Du noch oder findest Du schon? Literaturrecherche \& -verwaltung im Kontext von Stud.IP},
  series = {Tagungsband der logOS 2008 Konferenz},
  booktitle = {Tagungsband der logOS 2008 Konferenz},
  publisher = {EPOS Verlag Osnabr{\"u}ck},
  address   = {Osnabr{\"u}ck},
  pages     = {173 -- 178},
  year      = {2008},
  language  = {de}
}
@inproceedings{HuebnerSellemann2004,
  author    = {H{\"u}bner, U and Sellemann, B},
  title     = {Stand der IT im Krankenhaus - Ergebnisse einer Befragung aller Akutkrankenh{\"a}user in Deutschland},
  series = {Kooperative Versorgung, vernetzte Forschung, ubiquit{\"a}re Information - Tagungsband der GMDS 2004, 26 - 30 September 2004, Innsbruck / Ammenwerth E, Gaus W, Haux R, Lovis C, Pfeiffer KP, Tilg B, Wichmann HE (Hg.)},
  booktitle = {Kooperative Versorgung, vernetzte Forschung, ubiquit{\"a}re Information - Tagungsband der GMDS 2004, 26 - 30 September 2004, Innsbruck / Ammenwerth E, Gaus W, Haux R, Lovis C, Pfeiffer KP, Tilg B, Wichmann HE (Hg.)},
  pages     = {93 -- 95},
  year      = {2004},
  language  = {de}
}
@inproceedings{EgbertHuebnerAmmenwerthetal.2011,
  author    = {Egbert, Nicole and H{\"u}bner, Ursula and Ammenwerth, Elske and Schaubmayr, Christine and Sellemann, Bj{\"o}rn},
  title     = {Sind die Krankenh{\"a}user in {\"O}sterreich besser vernetzt als in Deutschland?},
  series = {Tagungsband eHealth 2011 Wien},
  booktitle = {Tagungsband eHealth 2011 Wien},
  address   = {Wien},
  pages     = {235 -- 239},
  year      = {2011},
  language  = {de}
}
@inproceedings{SellemannMaussQuadeetal.2014,
  author    = {Sellemann, B and Mauß, T and Quade, M and Rienhoff, O and H{\"u}bner, U and Schulte, G},
  title     = {Realisierbarkeit des ePflegeberichts f{\"u}r das Entlassungsmanagement mittels einer elektronischen Patientenakte gem{\"a}ß \S291a SGB V. GMDS 2014},
  series = {59. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft f{\"u}r Medizinische Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie e.V. (GMDS). G{\"o}ttingen, 07.-10.09.2014.},
  booktitle = {59. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft f{\"u}r Medizinische Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie e.V. (GMDS). G{\"o}ttingen, 07.-10.09.2014.},
  publisher = {German Medical Science GMS Publishing House},
  address   = {D{\"u}sseldorf},
  doi       = {10.3205/14gmds013},
  year      = {2014},
  language  = {de}
}
@inproceedings{HuebnerSellemannFrey2006,
  author    = {H{\"u}bner, U and Sellemann, B and Frey, A},
  title     = {Nutzung gemeinsamer IT-Strukturen im Rahmen der Integrierten Versorgung: aktueller Stand und Pl{\"a}ne aus Sicht der deutschen Krankenh{\"a}user},
  series = {Klinische Forschung Vernetzen - Programm- und Abstractband der GMDS 2006, 10 - 14 September 2006, Leipzig / L{\"o}ffler M, Winter A (Hg.)},
  booktitle = {Klinische Forschung Vernetzen - Programm- und Abstractband der GMDS 2006, 10 - 14 September 2006, Leipzig / L{\"o}ffler M, Winter A (Hg.)},
  pages     = {321 -- 322},
  year      = {2006},
  language  = {de}
}
@inproceedings{SellemannStausbergHuebner2012,
  author    = {Sellemann, Bj{\"o}rn and Stausberg, J{\"u}rgen and H{\"u}bner, Ursula},
  title     = {Nursing Routine Data as a Basis for Association Analysis in the Domain of Nursing Knowledge},
  series = {Proceedings of the 11thInternational Nursing Informatics Conference NI2012 Montreal},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the 11thInternational Nursing Informatics Conference NI2012 Montreal},
  pages     = {366},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {This paper describes the data mining method of association analysis within the framework of Knowledge Discovery in Databases (KDD) with the aim to identify standard patterns of nursing care. The approach is application-oriented and used on nursing routine data of the method LEP nursing 2. The increasing use of information technology in hospitals, especially of nursing information systems, requires the storage of large data sets, which hitherto have not always been analyzed adequately. Three association analyses for the days of admission, surgery and discharge, have been performed. The results of almost 1.5 million generated association rules indicate that it is valid to apply association analysis to nursing routine data. All rules are semantically trivial, since they reflect existing knowledge from the domain of nursing. This may be due either to the method LEP Nursing 2, or to the nursing activities themselves. Nonetheless, association analysis may in future become a useful analytical tool on the basis of structured nursing routine data.},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{HuebnerSellemann2004,
  author    = {H{\"u}bner, Ursula and Sellemann, Bj{\"o}rn},
  title     = {Nursing in the Information Age: Status Quo and Future of ICT use in German Hospitals},
  series = {Studies in Health Technology and Informatics},
  booktitle = {Studies in Health Technology and Informatics},
  doi       = {10.3233/978-1-60750-949-3-376},
  pages     = {376 -- 380},
  year      = {2004},
  abstract  = {Hospital information systems (HIS) should give support to nurses in their clinical and managerial duties. Though there are statistical data on the current use of HIS systems we know only little about the numbers of nursing modules implemented. We therefore conducted a nationwide survey in Germany (n = 2182) on the current state and future plans of HIS modules including nursing applications (response rate of 27.6 \%). The findings show that management applications (84 \% accounting) are still more frequent than clinical applications, in particular clinical patient record systems (19 \%). What applied for HIS modules in general held also true for nursing on a lower level. 'Whereas 51 \%of the hospitals had rostering systems in place only 6 \% used care planning software. Priorities and plans for the future reveal no change in the rank {\´o}rder of systems. We argue that in order for clinical documentation and planning systems to catch up they must be immediately rewarding for the clinicians in their daily need for information.},
  language  = {en}
}