@incollection{HarthPanke2018, author = {Harth, Thilo and Panke, Stefanie}, title = {Design Thinking in Teacher Education: Preparing Engineering Students for Teaching at Vocational Schools}, series = {Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (Hrsg.), E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2018}, booktitle = {Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (Hrsg.), E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2018}, publisher = {Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)}, address = {Chesapeake, VA}, isbn = {978-1-939797-35-3}, pages = {392 -- 407}, year = {2018}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{HarthPanke2019, author = {Harth, Thilo and Panke, Stefanie}, title = {Creating Effective Physical Learning Spaces in the Digital Age - Results of a Student-Centered Design Thinking Workshop}, series = {Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (Hrsg.), E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education}, booktitle = {Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (Hrsg.), E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education}, editor = {Carliner, Saul}, address = {New Orleans, US}, isbn = {ISBN 978-1-939797-45-2}, pages = {284 -- 294}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Learn anything, anytime, anywhere is the mantra for learning in the digital age. Digital learning opportunities are increasingly challenging traditional classroom learning - but what does this mean for the conceptual design and design-in-use of campus spaces as learning locations? Does space really not matter in learning? During a two-day design thinking workshop an interdisciplinary group of 17 students produced ideas for new learning spaces and mapped out their spatial learning journeys through campus offerings and daily routines. The article describes the workshop concept and resulting insights gleaned from interviews, customer journeys, and prototyping. It offers ideas and examples for creating inviting learning spaces and cultures that focus on co-presence both with and without digital tools.}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{HarthPanke2020, author = {Harth, Thilo and Panke, Stefanie}, title = {Thinking Inside the Box: Does Design Thinking Fit into Zoom Squares?}, series = {Innovative Learning Summit. Theo J. Bastiaens, Gary H. Marks (Eds.)}, booktitle = {Innovative Learning Summit. Theo J. Bastiaens, Gary H. Marks (Eds.)}, organization = {Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)}, pages = {423 -- 434}, year = {2020}, abstract = {The article describes and evaluates the concept and format of a 2-day design thinking workshop with vocational teacher candidate students. Drawing from our experiences as instructors as well as the qualitative feedback we received from students, we critically discuss what worked well and what was lost. We contrast the outcomes of this workshop with previous design thinking activities. The results highlight the qualities of design thinking that necessitate interaction in physical spaces, as well as opportunities for design thinking activities in a digitized format. As many regions experience second waves of COVID-19, educational programs will face the challenge of transforming physically co-located instruction to a completely virtual format. Our results can serve as a guide on how to recuperate energy and engagement for highly interactive seminars and workshops}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{HarthPanke2023, author = {Harth, Thilo and Panke, Stefanie}, title = {Playful Pedagogies in Vocational Education: Experimenting with Making, Design Thinking and Serious Play}, series = {LearnTechLib. Ed. Theo Bastiaens}, booktitle = {LearnTechLib. Ed. Theo Bastiaens}, publisher = {Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)}, address = {Waynesville, NC, USA}, isbn = {978-1-939797-71-1}, pages = {642 -- 656}, year = {2023}, abstract = {The paper describes the design, facilitation and outcomes of a series of workshops with faculty, staff and students from a teacher education program specialized in vocational education and training (VET). We analyze and reflect upon the facilitation techniques, discussion and participation results, and evaluation of the workshop series. Practitioners and researchers alike will find this article a valuable source for contemplating the effectiveness of design thinking, making and serious play in teacher education. While our case study is situated in the particular context of preparing future vocational teachers within the German VET system, the resulting concepts are applicable to other teacher education programs}, language = {en} } @article{HarthPanke2023, author = {Harth, Thilo and Panke, Stefanie}, title = {Design Thinking, Making and Serious Play: Similarities, Differences, and Workshop Concepts}, series = {International Journal for Educational Media and Technology}, volume = {17}, journal = {International Journal for Educational Media and Technology}, number = {2023/02}, issn = {1882-2290}, pages = {40 -- 52}, year = {2023}, abstract = {This article explores educational media pedagogies that are predominantly non-digital, but nonetheless timely and influential. Design Thinking, Making, and Serious Play are three distinct yet interrelated approaches to problem-solving, resilience and innovation that have gained increased traction in education over the past decade. We explore the similarities and differences between these playful, experiental pedagogies and provide an overview of how these approaches can be integrated effectively into education settings. Finally, we provide transferable examples, including evaluation results, from a weeklong workshop series at Muenster University of Applied Sciences conducted in Spring 2022. The article serves as a theoretically informed practical guide for educators and practitioners seeking to select, implement and evaluate playful pedagogies. It contributes to the understanding of underlying principles, characteristics, potential impact and limitations.}, language = {en} }