@misc{LinnemannLinnemann2020,
  author    = {Linnemann, Gesa and Linnemann, Patrick},
  title     = {Virtuelle Realit{\"a}t in der Biografiearbeit mit {\"A}lteren: Der Einfluss „Virtueller Reisen" auf Wohlbefinden und verbundene Gratifikationsaspekte - Posterpr{\"a}sentation auf der 3.Clusterkonferenz "Zukunft der Pflege", 17.09.2020, N{\"u}rnberg/ digital},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {de}
}
@inproceedings{LinnemannLinnemann2021,
  author    = {Linnemann, Gesa and Linnemann, Patrick},
  title     = {Virtuelle Realit{\"a}t in der Biografiearbeit mit {\"A}lteren: Der Einfluss „Virtueller Reisen" auf Wohlbefinden und verbundene Gratifikationsaspekte.},
  series = {Konferenzband 1 „Kann digital Pflege?", 3. Cluster-Konferenz Zukunft der Pflege, Pflege Professionell / Hrsg. J{\"u}rgen Zerth...},
  booktitle = {Konferenzband 1 „Kann digital Pflege?", 3. Cluster-Konferenz Zukunft der Pflege, Pflege Professionell / Hrsg. J{\"u}rgen Zerth...},
  publisher = {Facultas},
  address   = {Wien},
  issn      = {2710-3048},
  pages     = {72 -- 74},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {In der Lebensgeschichte spielen bedeutsame Orte eine große Rolle, die auch in der Biografiearbeit zum Tragen kommt. Der Umgebungsradius {\"a}lterer Menschen, die in Altenpflegeeinrichtungen leben, kann aufgrund gesundheitlicher und finanzieller Begrenzungen sehr eingeschr{\"a}nkt sein, Reisen k{\"o}nnen unter Umst{\"a}nden unm{\"o}glich sein. Aktuelle VR-Tech- nologie mit der Erfahrung der Immersion, des Eintauchens in die virtuelle Umgebung, k{\"o}nnte eine M{\"o}glichkeit sein, Orte (wieder) zu erleben, die schwierig oder unm{\"o}glich zu besuchen sind, und so in der Biografiearbeit genutzt werden. Die vorliegende Studie weist auf positive Effekte auf das Wohlbefinden hin und ermittelt Gratifikationseffekte der Nut- zung. Dabei sind besonders wichtige Kategorien Genuss, Hilfe beim Wiedererinnern und Erlebnis.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{LinnemannReginaBrummernhenrich2018,
  author    = {Linnemann, Gesa and Regina, Jucks and Brummernhenrich, Benjamin},
  title     = {Student Evaluations of a (Rude) Spoken Dialogue System Insights from an experimental study. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction},
  series = {Advances in Human-Computer Interaction},
  journal   = {Advances in Human-Computer Interaction},
  doi       = {10.1155/2018/8406187},
  pages     = {10},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Communicating with spoken dialogue systems (SDS) such as Apple's Siri® and Google's Now is becoming more and more common. We report a study that manipulates an SDS's word use with regard to politeness. In an experiment, 58 young adults evaluated the spoken messages of our self-developed SDS as it replied to typical questions posed by university freshmen. The answers were either formulated politely or rudely. Dependent measures were both holistic measures of how students perceived the SDS as well as detailed evaluations of each single answer. Results show that participants not only evaluated the content of rude answers as being less appropriate and less pleasant than the polite answers, but also evaluated the rude system as less accurate. Lack of politeness also impacted aspects of the perceived trustworthiness of the SDS. We conclude that users of SDS expect such systems to be polite, and we then discuss some practical implications for designing SDS.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{LinnemannJucks2018,
  author    = {Linnemann, Gesa and Jucks, Regina},
  title     = {'Can I Trust the Spoken Dialogue System Because It Uses the Same Words as I Do?'—Influence of Lexically Aligned Spoken Dialogue Systems on Trustworthiness and User Satisfaction},
  series = {Interacting with Computers},
  volume    = {30},
  journal   = {Interacting with Computers},
  number    = {3},
  doi       = {10.1093/iwc/iwy005},
  pages     = {173 -- 186},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {One of many ways in which spoken dialogue systems (SDS) are becoming more and more flexible is in their choice of words (e.g. alignment to the user's vocabulary). We examined how users perceive such adaptive and non-adaptive SDS regarding trustworthiness and usability. In Experiment 1, 130 participants read out questions to an SDS that either made or did not make lexical alignment in its replies. They perceived higher cognitive demand when the SDS did not employ alignment. In Experiment 2, 135 participants listened to a conversation between a human and the same SDS in an online study. They judged the aligned SDS to have more integrity and to be more likeable. Implications for the design of SDS are discussed.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{LinnemannJucks2016,
  author    = {Linnemann, Gesa and Jucks, Regina},
  title     = {As in the Question, so in the Answer? - Language Style of Human and Machine Speakers Affects Interlocutors' Convergence on Wordings},
  series = {Journal of Language and Social Psychology},
  volume    = {35},
  journal   = {Journal of Language and Social Psychology},
  number    = {6},
  doi       = {10.1177/0261927X15625444},
  pages     = {686 -- 697},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {People adapt their word choice to both humans and computers. In this study, language style (elaborated vs. restricted) and perceived conversational partner (human vs. spoken dialogue system) were varied. Convergence was greater when reacting to a restricted language style. Participants preferred human partners and an elaborated language style. In line with communication accommodation theory, results suggest that considering restricted capabilities (cognitive organization) constitutes a central motive for convergence. Implications for spoken dialogue system design are discussed.},
  language  = {en}
}
@incollection{JucksLinnemannThonetal.2016,
  author    = {Jucks, Regina and Linnemann, Gesa and Thon, F. M. and Zimmermann, M.},
  title     = {Trust the words: Insights into the role of language in trust building in a digitalized world},
  series = {Trust and Communication in a Digitalized World. Models and Concepts of Trust Research},
  booktitle = {Trust and Communication in a Digitalized World. Models and Concepts of Trust Research},
  editor    = {Bl{\"o}baum, B.},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Berlin},
  isbn      = {978-3-319-28059-2},
  doi       = {10.1007/978-3-319-28059-2},
  publisher      = {FH M{\"u}nster - University of Applied Sciences},
  pages     = {225 -- 237},
  year      = {2016},
  language  = {en}
}
@incollection{LinnemannBrummernhenrichJucks2014,
  author    = {Linnemann, Gesa and Brummernhenrich, B. and Jucks, Regina},
  title     = {A matter of politeness? On the role of face-threatening acts in online tutoring},
  series = {Face work and social media},
  booktitle = {Face work and social media},
  editor    = {Bedijs, K. and Held, G. and Maaß, C.},
  publisher = {LIT},
  address   = {M{\"u}nster},
  isbn      = {978-3-643-90435-5},
  publisher      = {FH M{\"u}nster - University of Applied Sciences},
  pages     = {423 -- 440},
  year      = {2014},
  language  = {en}
}
@book{LinnemannSenger2018,
  author    = {Linnemann, Gesa and Senger, Alexander},
  title     = {Xenophon, Anabasis. Griechischlekt{\"u}re},
  publisher = {Vandenhoeck \& Ruprecht},
  isbn      = {978-3-525-71746-2},
  publisher      = {FH M{\"u}nster - University of Applied Sciences},
  pages     = {95},
  year      = {2018},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{Linnemann2015,
  author    = {Linnemann, Gesa},
  title     = {R{\"o}mer in K{\"o}ln. Eine Entdeckungsreise in die antike Geschichte der Stadt. 1 Audio-CD},
  publisher = {Linnemann Verlag},
  address   = {M{\"u}nster},
  year      = {2015},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{LinnemannSenger2012,
  author    = {Linnemann, Gesa and Senger, A.},
  title     = {Anabasis: Das große Abenteuer des Griechen Xenophon. 2 Audio-CDs},
  publisher = {Linnemann Verlag},
  address   = {M{\"u}nster},
  year      = {2012},
  language  = {de}
}