@book{BoentertDellmannLojewski2016, author = {Boentert, Annika and Dellmann, Frank and Lojewski, Ute von}, title = {Wandelwege - Schriften f{\"u}r Hochschulmanagement und Hochschulforschung}, address = {M{\"u}nster}, year = {2016}, language = {de} } @incollection{BoentertErlemann2015, author = {Boentert, Annika and Erlemann, Christine}, title = {Von ersten Schritten zum akkreditierten Qualit{\"a}tsmanagement-System: Der Weg der Fachhochschule M{\"u}nster}, series = {Janssen, Johann G. et al.: Qualit{\"a}tsmanagement an Hochschulen. Das Praxisbuch. M{\"u}nchen.}, booktitle = {Janssen, Johann G. et al.: Qualit{\"a}tsmanagement an Hochschulen. Das Praxisbuch. M{\"u}nchen.}, pages = {247 -- 257}, year = {2015}, language = {de} } @misc{Boentert2024, author = {Boentert, Annika}, title = {Vom Wiegen wird die Sau nicht fett... Wozu evaluieren wir eigentlich? (QM-Symposium, M{\"u}nster)}, year = {2024}, language = {de} } @article{BoentertPistor2021, author = {Boentert, Annika and Pistor, Petra}, title = {Turning digital in international training programmes: Chances, Challenges \& Perspectives}, series = {zfhe - Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Hochschulentwicklung}, volume = {16}, journal = {zfhe - Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Hochschulentwicklung}, number = {2}, editor = {Bedenlier, Svenja and Bruhn-Zaß, Elisa}, doi = {10.3217/zfhe-16-02/06}, pages = {83 -- 94}, year = {2021}, abstract = {Teaching and learning in international and thus intercultural contexts places special demands on the conception of trainings. The same holds true for online or distance learning. Taken together, both factors - training in an intercultural and online context - pose specific didactic and technical challenges. Against the background of the COVID-19 pandemic all international training programmes under the umbrella of the Higher Education Management Programme at FH M{\"u}nster -University of Applied Sciences had to be held online. In the article on hand we share our experiences with online training for actors in the higher education area from developing and emerging countries and discuss its specific demands along the lines of common criteria for effective learning.}, language = {en} } @misc{Boentert2020, author = {Boentert, Annika}, title = {The CORE model for Quality Development - A case study of FH M{\"u}nster (HAQAA - Workshop, Harmonisation of African Higher Education Quality Assurance and Accreditation)}, year = {2020}, language = {en} } @article{Boentert2019, author = {Boentert, Annika}, title = {The CORE Concept: Four Steps to a Quality Management System for Higher Education Institutions}, series = {Application-Oriented Higher Education Research}, volume = {2019, Vol. 4}, journal = {Application-Oriented Higher Education Research}, number = {2}, editor = {Fichtner, Karl Ernst and Lackner, Hendrik}, issn = {2096-2045}, pages = {56 -- 62}, year = {2019}, abstract = {The CORE concept facilitates the implementation of a quality management system in higher education institutions. It defines four essential steps: to clarify goals, optimize processes, reflect outcomes, and encourage improvement, which must be applied to different objects. The article explains how the model can be used for an initial organizational analysis and the conception of your own QM system. The concept was developed at FH M{\"u}nster, a large German university of applied sciences. In the last years, it has successfully been used in consulting projects with universities in Latin America and Africa.}, language = {zh} } @inproceedings{Boentert2019, author = {Boentert, Annika}, title = {Systemreakkreditierung als Entwicklungsimpuls. Das Modell der FH M{\"u}nster}, series = {Systeme im Wandel. Hochschulen auf neuen Wegen}, booktitle = {Systeme im Wandel. Hochschulen auf neuen Wegen}, editor = {Mitterauer, Lukas and Pohlenz, Philipp and Harris-H{\"u}mmert, Susan}, publisher = {Waxmann Verlag}, address = {M{\"u}nster}, organization = {Arbeitskreis Hochschulen der DeGEval}, isbn = {978-3-8309-4052-4}, pages = {65 -- 75}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Als erste deutsche Hochschule wurde die FH M{\"u}nster im Sommer 2017 systemreakkreditiert. Grundlage der Akkreditierungsentscheidung war ein Konzept, das die Hochschule im Herbst 2014 im Kontext der Experimentierklausel" des Akkreditierungsrats entwickelt hatte. Mittlerweile st{\"o}ßt dieses Konzept auf reges Interesse bei anderen systemakkreditierten Hochschulen, bietet doch das ge{\"a}nderte Akkreditierungsrecht seit Januar 2018 explizit die M{\"o}glichkeit, in Abstimmung mit dem Akkreditierungsrat und der jeweils zust{\"a}ndigen Wissenschaftsbeh{\"o}rde „alternative Akkreditierungsverfahren" zu gestalten Vor diesem Hintergrund erl{\"a}utert der Aufsatz den Kontext der Experimentierklausel, das Reakkreditierungsverfahren der FH M{\"u}nster und die Neugestaltung des Akkreditierungsrechts. Vor allem aber werden die Gr{\"u}nde, die zur Entwicklung des neuen Ansatzes f{\"u}hrten, dargestellt, bevor dann das kumulative Akkreditierungskonzept der FH M{\"u}nster skizziert wird. Die Ausarbeitung schließt mit ersten Hinweisen darauf, welche Argumente bei der Entscheidung zwischen einem alternativen - hier: kumulativen - und einem konventionellen Reakkreditierungsverfahren abzuw{\"a}gen sind.}, language = {de} } @article{BoentertvonLojewski2018, author = {Boentert, Annika and von Lojewski, Ute}, title = {Starke Entwicklungsimpulse f{\"u}r die eigene Hochschule}, series = {DUZ Wissenschaft und Management}, volume = {2018}, journal = {DUZ Wissenschaft und Management}, number = {1}, pages = {28 -- 33}, year = {2018}, language = {de} } @inproceedings{Boentert2019, author = {Boentert, Annika}, title = {Rethinking Quality Managament: Designing internal quality assurance and external accreditation as learning opportunities}, organization = {EAIR - European Association for Institutional Research}, year = {2019}, abstract = {The quality management system of FH M{\"u}nster, a German university of applied sciences with 15.000 students, was established ten years ago. The main goal was to systematically foster reflection on quality issues in all faculties. In 2016, the concept was transferred to the level of institutional reaccreditation: A procedure called „cumulative accreditation" was implemented, including e.g. a public symposium. On both levels, the author experienced that joint reflection on quality issues may encourage academics to change habits and improve study programmes. However, sometimes desirable changes will not happen. Instead of asking for sanctions and incentives, the article suggests another approach: the creation of learning opportunities for university members.}, language = {en} } @article{Boentert2013, author = {Boentert, Annika}, title = {Qualit{\"a}tskultur durch Kommunikation. Das Beispiel der Fachhochschule M{\"u}nster}, series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Hochschulentwicklung}, journal = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Hochschulentwicklung}, number = {Nr. 2}, pages = {126 -- 137}, year = {2013}, language = {de} }