@incollection{AtkinsonGerbigBarthetal.2012, author = {Atkinson, Colin and Gerbig, Ralph and Barth, Florian and Freiling, Felix and Schinzel, Sebastian and Hadasch, Frank and Maedche, Alexander and M{\"u}ller, Benjamin}, title = {Reducing the Incidence of Unintended, Human-Caused Information Flows in Enterprise Systems}, series = {Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops (EDOCW), 2012 IEEE 16th International}, booktitle = {Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops (EDOCW), 2012 IEEE 16th International}, edition = {3M4SE 2012}, doi = {10.1109/EDOCW.2012.12}, pages = {11 -- 18}, year = {2012}, language = {en} } @incollection{BauerSchinzelFelixetal.2016, author = {Bauer, Johannes and Schinzel, Sebastian and Felix, C. and Freiling, Andreas}, title = {Information leakage behind the curtain: Abusing anti-EMI features for covert communication}, series = {Hardware Oriented Security and Trust (HOST), 2016 IEEE International Symposium on}, booktitle = {Hardware Oriented Security and Trust (HOST), 2016 IEEE International Symposium on}, doi = {10.1109/HST.2016.7495570}, pages = {130 -- 134}, year = {2016}, language = {en} } @article{BrinkmannDresenMergetetal.2021, author = {Brinkmann, Marcus and Dresen, Christian and Merget, Robert and Poddebniak, Damian and M{\"u}ller, Jens and Somorovsky, Juraj and Schwenk, J{\"o}rg and Schinzel, Sebastian}, title = {ALPACA: Application Layer Protocol Confusion - Analyzing and Mitigating Cracks in TLS Authentication}, series = {30th USENIX Security Symposium}, journal = {30th USENIX Security Symposium}, year = {2021}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{DresenIsingPoddebniaketal.2020, author = {Dresen, Christian and Ising, Fabian and Poddebniak, Damian and Kappert, Tobias and Holz, Thorsten and Schinzel, Sebastian}, title = {CORSICA: Cross-Origin Web Service Identification}, series = {The 15th ACM ASIA Conference on Computer and Communications Security}, booktitle = {The 15th ACM ASIA Conference on Computer and Communications Security}, editor = {Zhou, Jianying}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Vulnerabilities in private networks are difficult to detect for attackers outside of the network. While there are known methods for port scanning internal hosts that work by luring unwitting internal users to an external web page that hosts malicious JavaScript code, no such method for detailed and precise service identification is known. The reason is that the Same Origin Policy (SOP) prevents access to HTTP responses of other origins by default. We perform a structured analysis of loopholes in the SOP that can be used to identify web applications across network boundaries. For this, we analyze HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript features of standard-compliant web browsers that may leak sensitive information about cross-origin content. The results reveal several novel techniques, including leaking JavaScript function names or styles of cross-origin requests that are available in all common browsers. We implement and test these techniques in a tool called CORSICA. It can successfully identify 31 of 42 (74\%) of web services running on different IoT devices as well as the version numbers of the four most widely used content management systems WordPress, Drupal, Joomla, and TYPO3. CORSICA can also determine the patch level on average down to three versions (WordPress), six versions (Drupal), two versions (Joomla), and four versions (TYPO3) with only ten requests on average. Furthermore, CORSICA is able to identify 48 WordPress plugins containing 65 vulnerabilities. Finally, we analyze mitigation strategies and show that the proposed but not yet implemented strategies Cross-Origin Resource Policy (CORP)} and Sec-Metadata would prevent our identification techniques.}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{EbbersIsingSaatjohannetal.2021, author = {Ebbers, Simon and Ising, Fabian and Saatjohann, Christoph and Schinzel, Sebastian}, title = {Grand Theft App: Digital Forensics of Vehicle Assistant Apps}, series = {ARES 2021: The 16th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security}, booktitle = {ARES 2021: The 16th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security}, doi = {10.1145/3465481.3465754}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:hbz:836-opus-139031}, year = {2021}, abstract = {Due to the increasing connectivity of modern vehicles, collected data is no longer only stored in the vehicle itself but also transmitted to car manufacturers and vehicle assistant apps. This development opens up new possibilities for digital forensics in criminal investigations involving modern vehicles. This paper deals with the digital forensic analysis of vehicle assistant apps of eight car manufacturers. We reconstruct the driver's activities based on the data stored on the smartphones and in the manufacturer's backend. For this purpose, data of the Android and iOS apps of the car manufacturers Audi, BMW, Ford, Mercedes, Opel, Seat, Tesla, and Volkswagen were extracted from the smartphone and examined using digital forensic methods following forensics guidelines. Additionally, manufacturer data was retrieved using Subject Access Requests. Using the extensive data gathered, we reconstruct trips and refueling processes, determine parking positions and duration, and track the locking and unlocking of the vehicle. Our findings show that the digital forensic investigation of smartphone applications is a useful addition to vehicle forensics and should therefore be taken into account in the strategic preparation of future digital forensic investigations.}, language = {en} } @incollection{EbingerSchinzelSchmuckler2008, author = {Ebinger, Peter and Schinzel, Sebastian and Schmuckler, Martin}, title = {Security mechanisms of a legal peer-to-peer file sharing system}, series = {IADIS International Conference Applied Computing}, booktitle = {IADIS International Conference Applied Computing}, year = {2008}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{GierlingDresenEichetal.2018, author = {Gierling, Markus and Dresen, Christian and Eich, Hans and Mittman, Karin and Schinzel, Sebastian and Haverkamp, Uwe}, title = {Analysis and consequences of an imaging process concerning the cyber security of a networked computer tomography scanner}, series = {STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE}, booktitle = {STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE}, pages = {185 -- 186}, year = {2018}, language = {en} } @article{GierlingSaatjohannDresenetal.2020, author = {Gierling, Markus and Saatjohann, Christoph and Dresen, Christian and K{\"o}be, Julia and Rath, Benjamin and Eckardt, Lars and Schinzel, Sebastian}, title = {Reviewing Cyber Security Research of Implantable Medical Rhythm Devices regarding Patients' Risk}, series = {86. Jahrestagung und Herztage 2020 der DGK}, volume = {Band 109, Supplement 1, April 2020}, journal = {86. Jahrestagung und Herztage 2020 der DGK}, doi = {10.1007/s00392-020-01621-0}, pages = {1 -- 2}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Introduction: The recent publication of several critical cyber security issues in cardiac implantable devices and the resulting press coverage upsets affected users and their trust in medical device producers. Reviewing the published security vulnerabilities regarding networked medical devices, it raises the question, if the reporting media, the responsible security researchers, and the producers handle security vulnerabilities appropriately. Are the media reports of security vulnerabilities in medical devices meaningful in a way that patients can assess their respective risk for an attack via the security vulnerability? The collaboration between IT-security experts and clinicians aims at reviewing published security vulnerabilities of rhythm devices, and evaluate overall patients risks. Methodology: We performed a literature review on security vulnerabilities in implantable medical devices with a focus on cardiac devices. We analyzed (Fig. 1) the (1) requirements for an attacker and the (2) technical feasibility and clustered them in three different scenarios: The first scenario requires that the attacker physically approaches a victim with a programming device. The second scenario requires proximity to the victim, e.g., within a few meters. The third and strongest attacker scenario is a remote attack that doesn't require any physical proximity to the victim. We then compare the attacker scenarios and (3) the overall patients' risks with the press coverage (overhyped, adequate, underhyped). (4) The resulting overall patients' risk was rated by clinicians (security vulnerability of patients' data, dangerous programming possible). Results: Out of the three analyzed incidents, we found one to be underhyped, one to be overhyped, and one was appropriate compared to the medial coverage (Fig. 2). The most occurring technical issues were based on the absence of basic security primitives. The patient damage for all of the analyzed incidents was fatal in the worst-case scenario. Further, the patient damage and the overall patient risks are disjunct due to the missing capability of performing large scale attacks. Conclusion: The resulting overall patients' risks may not adequately reflect the patient damage in the considered cases. Often, the overall patient risk is not as severe as the necessary attacker capabilities are high and it would require strongly motivated attackers to perform the attack. Therefore, most of the reviewed cases are considered with a smaller overall patient risk than implied by press reports. Reviewing the ongoing IT-Security trends regarding implantable medical devices shows an increasing focus on researching in the field of medical device security. Therefore, further findings in the near future are to be expected. To deal with this fact in a responsible way, proper proactive knowledge management is mandatory. We recommend medical staff to critically reflect reports in mass media due to possible sensationalism. Therefore, we propose a joint approach in combining the technical expertise of cyber security experts with clinical aspects of medical experts, to ensure a solid understanding of a newly published vulnerability. The combination of both communities promises to result in better predictions for patients' risks from security vulnerabilities in implanted cardiac devices.}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{IsingPoddebniakKappertetal.2023, author = {Ising, Fabian and Poddebniak, Damian and Kappert, Tobias and Saatjohann, Christoph and Schinzel, Sebastian}, title = {Content-Type: multipart/oracle -- Tapping into Format Oracles in Email End-to-End Encryption}, series = {32nd USENIX Security Symposium}, booktitle = {32nd USENIX Security Symposium}, publisher = {USENIX Association}, year = {2023}, abstract = {S/MIME and OpenPGP use cryptographic constructions repeatedly shown to be vulnerable to format oracle attacks in protocols like TLS, SSH, or IKE. However, format oracle attacks in the End-to-End Encryption (E2EE) email setting are considered impractical as victims would need to open many attacker-modified emails and communicate the decryption result to the attacker. But is this really the case? In this paper, we survey how an attacker may remotely learn the decryption state in email E2EE. We analyze the interplay of MIME and IMAP and describe side-channels emerging from network patterns that leak the decryption status in Mail User Agents (MUAs). Concretely, we introduce specific MIME trees that produce decryption-dependent net work patterns when opened in a victim's email client. We survey 19 OpenPGP- and S/MIME-enabled email clients and four cryptographic libraries and uncover a side-channel leaking the decryption status of S/MIME messages in one client. Further, we discuss why the exploitation in the other clients is impractical and show that it is due to missing feature support and implementation quirks. These unintended defenses create an unfortunate conflict between usability and security. We present more rigid countermeasures for MUA developers and the standards to prevent exploitation.}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{MayerPoddebniakFischeretal.2022, author = {Mayer, Peter and Poddebniak, Damian and Fischer, Konstantin and Brinkmann, Marcus and Somorovsky, Juraj and Schinzel, Sebastian and Volkamer, Melanie}, title = {"I don't know why I check this...'' - Investigating Expert Users' Strategies to Detect Email Signature Spoofing Attacks}, series = {Eighteenth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS 2022)}, booktitle = {Eighteenth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS 2022)}, publisher = {USENIX Association}, address = {Boston, MA}, isbn = {978-1-939133-30-4}, pages = {77 -- 96}, year = {2022}, abstract = {OpenPGP is one of the two major standards for end-to-end email security. Several studies showed that serious usability issues exist with tools implementing this standard. However, a widespread assumption is that expert users can handle these tools and detect signature spoofing attacks. We present a user study investigating expert users' strategies to detect signature spoofing attacks in Thunderbird. We observed 25 expert users while they classified eight emails as either having a legitimate signature or not. Studying expert users explicitly gives us an upper bound of attack detection rates of all users dealing with PGP signatures. 52\% of participants fell for at least one out of four signature spoofing attacks. Overall, participants did not have an established strategy for evaluating email signature legitimacy. We observed our participants apply 23 different types of checks when inspecting signed emails, but only 8 of these checks tended to be useful in identifying the spoofed or invalid signatures. In performing their checks, participants were frequently startled, confused, or annoyed with the user interface, which they found supported them little. All these results paint a clear picture: Even expert users struggle to verify email signatures, usability issues in email security are not limited to novice users, and developers may need proper guidance on implementing email signature GUIs correctly.}, language = {en} }