@article{NitscheBusseKernebecketal.2022, author = {Nitsche, Julia and Busse, Theresa Sophie and Kernebeck, Sven and Ehlers, Jan P.}, title = {Virtual Classrooms and Their Challenge of Interaction—An Evaluation of Chat Activities and Logs in an Online Course about Digital Medicine with Heterogeneous Participants}, series = {International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health}, volume = {19}, journal = {International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health}, issn = {1661-7827}, doi = {10.25974/fhms-17308}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:hbz:836-opus-173083}, pages = {10184}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Learning digital competencies can be successful if the information is also tried out immediately using interactive elements. However, interactive teaching poses a particular challenge, especially in large group formats. Various strategies are used to promote interaction, but there is little known about the results. This article shows different strategies and evaluates their influence on the interaction rate in a large group course over two terms that teaches digital medicine. Log files and participation in surveys as well as participation in chat were quantitatively evaluated. In addition, the chat messages themselves were evaluated qualitatively. For the evaluation, relation to the total number of participants was particularly relevant in order to be able to determine an interaction rate in the individual course sessions. A maximum average interaction rate of 90.97\% could be determined over the entire term while the participants wrote an average of 3.96 comments during a session in the chat. In summary, this research could show that interactive elements should be well planned and used at regular intervals in order to reap the benefits.}, language = {de} } @inproceedings{BusseKernebeckNefetal.2020, author = {Busse, Theresa Sophie and Kernebeck, Sven and Nef, Larissa and Kickbusch, Ilona and Ehlers, Jan P.}, title = {Talk to me - Soziale Roboter im Gesundheitswesen.}, series = {Report Careum Dialog 2020}, booktitle = {Report Careum Dialog 2020}, year = {2020}, language = {de} } @article{BusseJuxKernebecketal.2021, author = {Busse, Theresa Sophie and Jux, Chantal and Kernebeck, Sven and Meister, Sven and Ehlers, Jan P.}, title = {Steigerung der Versorgungsqualit{\"a}t in der Palliativversorgung durch elektronische Gesundheitsakten}, series = {Monitor Versorgungsforschung}, volume = {14}, journal = {Monitor Versorgungsforschung}, issn = {1866-0533}, doi = {10.25974/fhms-17303}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:hbz:836-opus-173035}, pages = {45 -- 50}, year = {2021}, language = {de} } @article{KernebeckBusseFischeretal.2024, author = {Kernebeck, Sven and Busse, Theresa Sophie and Fischer, Florian and Ehlers, Jan P.}, title = {Partizipatives Design im Kontext gesundheitsbezogener Technologien - Herausforderungen und Handlungserfordernisse aus Perspektive der Versorgungsforschung}, series = {Das Gesundheitswesen}, journal = {Das Gesundheitswesen}, issn = {0941-3790}, doi = {10.1055/a-2184-5731}, pages = {1 -- 6}, year = {2024}, abstract = {Partizipatives Design (PD) erm{\"o}glicht den Einbezug von Nutzer:innen in den Entwicklungsprozess digitaler Technologien im Gesundheitswesen. Der Einsatz von PD birgt jedoch H{\"u}rden, da theoretische und methodische Entscheidungen zu treffen sind. Oftmals werden diese in Forschungsarbeiten in der Versorgungsforschung nicht hinreichend dargestellt oder begr{\"u}ndet. Dies kann zu einer eingeschr{\"a}nkten Bewertbarkeit und Nachvollziehbarkeit der Ergebnisse f{\"u}hren. Der vorliegende Beitrag thematisiert drei Schwerpunkte: Erstens wird ein {\"U}berblick {\"u}ber die wesentlichen theoretischen und methodischen Entscheidungen gegeben, die im Rahmen des PD aus Perspektive der Versorgungsforschung getroffen werden m{\"u}ssen. Zweitens werden die damit einhergehenden Herausforderungen aufgezeigt und drittens Erfordernisse f{\"u}r die zuk{\"u}nftige Anwendung und (Weiter-)Entwicklung des PD in der Versorgungsforschung beschrieben.}, language = {de} } @article{NitscheSmetanaKochaneketal.2021, author = {Nitsche, Julia and Smetana, Jan and Kochanek, Tonja and Busse, Theresa Sophie and Kernebeck, Sven and Taetz-Harrer, Angelika and Zupanic, Michaela and Eulitz, Mona and Ehlers, Jan P.}, title = {Needs must when the devil drives - Migration of an entire university to digital teaching}, series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Hochschulentwicklung}, volume = {16}, journal = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Hochschulentwicklung}, number = {3}, doi = {10.25974/fhms-17316}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:hbz:836-opus-173168}, year = {2021}, language = {en} } @article{BusseJuxLaseretal.2023, author = {Busse, Theresa Sophie and Jux, Chantal and Laser, Johannes and Rasche, Peter and Vollmar, Horst Christian and Ehlers, Jan P and Kernebeck, Sven}, title = {Involving Health Care Professionals in the Development of Electronic Health Records: Scoping Review}, series = {JMIR Human Factors}, volume = {10}, journal = {JMIR Human Factors}, doi = {10.25974/fhms-17305}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:hbz:836-opus-173050}, pages = {e45598}, year = {2023}, abstract = {Electronic health records (EHRs) are a promising approach to document and map (complex) health information gathered in health care worldwide. However, possible unintended consequences during use, which can occur owing to low usability or the lack of adaption to existing workflows (eg, high cognitive load), may pose a challenge. To prevent this, the involvement of users in the development of EHRs is crucial and growing. Overall, involvement is designed to be very multifaceted, for example, in terms of the timing, frequency, or even methods used to capture user preferences. Setting, users and their needs, and the context and practice of health care must be considered in the design and subsequent implementation of EHRs. Many different approaches to user involvement exist, each requiring a variety of methodological choices. The aim of the study was to provide an overview of the existing forms of user involvement and the circumstances they need and to provide support for the planning of new involvement processes. We conducted a scoping review to provide a database for future projects on which design of inclusion is worthwhile and to show the diversity of reporting. Using a very broad search string, we searched the PubMed, CINAHL, and Scopus databases. In addition, we searched Google Scholar. Hits were screened according to scoping review methodology and then examined, focusing on methods and materials, participants, frequency and design of the development, and competencies of the researchers involved. In total, 70 articles were included in the final analysis. There was a wide range of methods of involvement. Physicians and nurses were the most frequently included groups and, in most cases, were involved only once in the process. The approach of involvement (eg, co-design) was not specified in most of the studies (44/70, 63\%). Further qualitative deficiencies in the reporting were evident in the presentation of the competences of members of the research and development teams. Think-aloud sessions, interviews, and prototypes were frequently used. This review provides insights into the diversity of health care professionals' involvement in the development of EHRs. It provides an overview of the different approaches in various fields of health care. However, it also shows the necessity of considering quality standards in the development of EHRs together with future users and the need for reporting this in future studies.}, language = {de} } @article{KernebeckBusseJuxetal.2021, author = {Kernebeck, Sven and Busse, Theresa Sophie and Jux, Chantal and Bork, Ulrich and Ehlers, Jan P.}, title = {Electronic Medical Records for (Visceral) Medicine: An Overview of the Current Status and Prospects}, series = {Visceral Medicine}, volume = {37}, journal = {Visceral Medicine}, issn = {2297-4725}, doi = {10.1159/000519254}, pages = {476 -- 481}, year = {2021}, abstract = {Background: Electronic medical records (EMRs) offer key advantages over analog documentation in healthcare. In addition to providing details about current and past treatments, EMRs enable clear and traceable documentation regardless of the location. This supports evidence-based, multi-professional treatment and leads to more efficient healthcare. However, there are still several challenges regarding the use of EMRs. Understanding these challenges is essential to improve healthcare. The aim of this article is to provide an overview of the current state of EMRs in the field of visceral medicine, to describe the future prospects in this field, and to highlight some of the challenges that need to be faced. Summary: The benefits of EMRs are manifold and particularly pronounced in the area of quality assurance and improvement of communication not only between different healthcare professionals but also between physicians and patients. Besides the danger of medical errors, the health consequences for the users (cognitive load) arise from poor usability or a system that does not fit into the real world. Involving users in the development of EMRs in the sense of participatory design can be helpful here. The use of EMRs in practice together with patients should be accompanied by training to ensure optimal outcomes in terms of shared decision-making. Key Message: EMRs offer a variety of benefits. However, it is critical to consider user involvement, setting specificity, and user training during development, implementation, and use in order to minimize unintended consequences.}, language = {en} } @article{BusseNitscheKernebecketal.2022, author = {Busse, Theresa Sophie and Nitsche, Julia and Kernebeck, Sven and Jux, Chantal and Weitz, J{\"u}rgen and Ehlers, Jan P. and Bork, Ulrich}, title = {Approaches to Improvement of Digital Health Literacy (eHL) in the Context of Person-Centered Care}, series = {International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health}, volume = {19}, journal = {International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health}, issn = {1661-7827}, doi = {10.25974/fhms-17311}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:hbz:836-opus-173115}, pages = {8309}, year = {2022}, abstract = {The skills, knowledge and resources to search for, find, understand, evaluate and apply health information is defined as health literacy (HL). If individuals want to use health information from the Internet, they need Digital Health Literacy (eHL), which in addition to HL also includes, for example, media literacy. If information cannot be found or understood by patients due to low (e)HL, patients will not have the opportunity to make informed decisions. In addition, many health apps for self-management or prevention also require (e)HL. Thus, it follows that active participation in healthcare, in terms of Person-Centered Care (PCC) is only possible through (e)HL. Currently, there is a great need to strengthen these competencies in society to achieve increased empowerment of patients and their health. However, at the same time, there is a need to train and improve competencies in the field of healthcare professionals so that they can counsel and guide patients. This article provides an overview with a focus on HL and eHL in healthcare, shows the opportunities to adapt services and describes the possible handling of patients with low (e)HL. In addition, the opportunities for patients and healthcare professionals to improve (e)HL are highlighted.}, language = {de} }