@inproceedings{BusseKernebeckNefetal.2020,
  author    = {Busse, Theresa Sophie and Kernebeck, Sven and Nef, Larissa and Kickbusch, Ilona and Ehlers, Jan P.},
  title     = {Talk to me - Soziale Roboter im Gesundheitswesen.},
  series = {Report Careum Dialog 2020},
  booktitle = {Report Careum Dialog 2020},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{KernebeckBusseJuxetal.2021,
  author    = {Kernebeck, Sven and Busse, Theresa Sophie and Jux, Chantal and Bork, Ulrich and Ehlers, Jan P.},
  title     = {Electronic Medical Records for (Visceral) Medicine: An Overview of the Current Status and Prospects},
  series = {Visceral Medicine},
  volume    = {37},
  journal   = {Visceral Medicine},
  issn      = {2297-4725},
  doi       = {10.1159/000519254},
  pages     = {476 -- 481},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Background: Electronic medical records (EMRs) offer key advantages over analog documentation in healthcare. In addition to providing details about current and past treatments, EMRs enable clear and traceable documentation regardless of the location. This supports evidence-based, multi-professional treatment and leads to more efficient healthcare. However, there are still several challenges regarding the use of EMRs. Understanding these challenges is essential to improve healthcare. The aim of this article is to provide an overview of the current state of EMRs in the field of visceral medicine, to describe the future prospects in this field, and to highlight some of the challenges that need to be faced. Summary: The benefits of EMRs are manifold and particularly pronounced in the area of quality assurance and improvement of communication not only between different healthcare professionals but also between physicians and patients. Besides the danger of medical errors, the health consequences for the users (cognitive load) arise from poor usability or a system that does not fit into the real world. Involving users in the development of EMRs in the sense of participatory design can be helpful here. The use of EMRs in practice together with patients should be accompanied by training to ensure optimal outcomes in terms of shared decision-making. Key Message: EMRs offer a variety of benefits. However, it is critical to consider user involvement, setting specificity, and user training during development, implementation, and use in order to minimize unintended consequences.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KernebeckBusseFischeretal.2024,
  author    = {Kernebeck, Sven and Busse, Theresa Sophie and Fischer, Florian and Ehlers, Jan P.},
  title     = {Partizipatives Design im Kontext gesundheitsbezogener Technologien - Herausforderungen und Handlungserfordernisse aus Perspektive der Versorgungsforschung},
  series = {Das Gesundheitswesen},
  journal   = {Das Gesundheitswesen},
  issn      = {0941-3790},
  doi       = {10.1055/a-2184-5731},
  pages     = {1 -- 6},
  year      = {2024},
  abstract  = {Partizipatives Design (PD) erm{\"o}glicht den Einbezug von Nutzer:innen in den Entwicklungsprozess digitaler Technologien im Gesundheitswesen. Der Einsatz von PD birgt jedoch H{\"u}rden, da theoretische und methodische Entscheidungen zu treffen sind. Oftmals werden diese in Forschungsarbeiten in der Versorgungsforschung nicht hinreichend dargestellt oder begr{\"u}ndet. Dies kann zu einer eingeschr{\"a}nkten Bewertbarkeit und Nachvollziehbarkeit der Ergebnisse f{\"u}hren. Der vorliegende Beitrag thematisiert drei Schwerpunkte: Erstens wird ein {\"U}berblick {\"u}ber die wesentlichen theoretischen und methodischen Entscheidungen gegeben, die im Rahmen des PD aus Perspektive der Versorgungsforschung getroffen werden m{\"u}ssen. Zweitens werden die damit einhergehenden Herausforderungen aufgezeigt und drittens Erfordernisse f{\"u}r die zuk{\"u}nftige Anwendung und (Weiter-)Entwicklung des PD in der Versorgungsforschung beschrieben.},
  language  = {de}
}