@article{BusseJuxKernebecketal.2021,
  author    = {Busse, Theresa Sophie and Jux, Chantal and Kernebeck, Sven and Meister, Sven and Ehlers, Jan P.},
  title     = {Steigerung der Versorgungsqualit{\"a}t in der Palliativversorgung durch elektronische Gesundheitsakten},
  series = {Monitor Versorgungsforschung},
  volume    = {14},
  journal   = {Monitor Versorgungsforschung},
  issn      = {1866-0533},
  doi       = {10.25974/fhms-17303},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:hbz:836-opus-173035},
  pages     = {45 -- 50},
  year      = {2021},
  language  = {de}
}
@inproceedings{BusseJuxKernebecketal.2021,
  author    = {Busse, Theresa Sophie and Jux, Chantal and Kernebeck, Sven and Meyer, Dorothee and Dreier, Larissa and Zenz, Daniel and Wager, Julia and Zernikow, Boris and Ehlers, Jan Peter},
  title     = {"Manchmal gehen die Faxger{\"a}te gerade nicht so wie sie sollen. Dann kommt irgendwie nichts an und dann ruft man das f{\"u}nfte Mal an." - Nutzung von Design Thinking zur partizipativen Entwicklung einer elektronischen Fallakte in der p{\"a}diatrischen Palliativversorgung},
  series = {20. Deutscher Kongress f{\"u}r Versorgungsforschung, 06. - 08.10.2021, digital},
  booktitle = {20. Deutscher Kongress f{\"u}r Versorgungsforschung, 06. - 08.10.2021, digital},
  doi       = {10.3205/21dkvf220},
  year      = {2021},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{BusseJuxLaseretal.2023,
  author    = {Busse, Theresa Sophie and Jux, Chantal and Laser, Johannes and Rasche, Peter and Vollmar, Horst Christian and Ehlers, Jan P and Kernebeck, Sven},
  title     = {Involving Health Care Professionals in the Development of Electronic Health Records: Scoping Review},
  series = {JMIR Human Factors},
  volume    = {10},
  journal   = {JMIR Human Factors},
  doi       = {10.25974/fhms-17305},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:hbz:836-opus-173050},
  pages     = {e45598},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Electronic health records (EHRs) are a promising approach to document and map (complex) health information gathered in health care worldwide. However, possible unintended consequences during use, which can occur owing to low usability or the lack of adaption to existing workflows (eg, high cognitive load), may pose a challenge. To prevent this, the involvement of users in the development of EHRs is crucial and growing. Overall, involvement is designed to be very multifaceted, for example, in terms of the timing, frequency, or even methods used to capture user preferences. Setting, users and their needs, and the context and practice of health care must be considered in the design and subsequent implementation of EHRs. Many different approaches to user involvement exist, each requiring a variety of methodological choices. The aim of the study was to provide an overview of the existing forms of user involvement and the circumstances they need and to provide support for the planning of new involvement processes. We conducted a scoping review to provide a database for future projects on which design of inclusion is worthwhile and to show the diversity of reporting. Using a very broad search string, we searched the PubMed, CINAHL, and Scopus databases. In addition, we searched Google Scholar. Hits were screened according to scoping review methodology and then examined, focusing on methods and materials, participants, frequency and design of the development, and competencies of the researchers involved. In total, 70 articles were included in the final analysis. There was a wide range of methods of involvement. Physicians and nurses were the most frequently included groups and, in most cases, were involved only once in the process. The approach of involvement (eg, co-design) was not specified in most of the studies (44/70, 63\%). Further qualitative deficiencies in the reporting were evident in the presentation of the competences of members of the research and development teams. Think-aloud sessions, interviews, and prototypes were frequently used. This review provides insights into the diversity of health care professionals' involvement in the development of EHRs. It provides an overview of the different approaches in various fields of health care. However, it also shows the necessity of considering quality standards in the development of EHRs together with future users and the need for reporting this in future studies.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{BusseKernebeckDreieretal.2020,
  author    = {Busse, Theresa Sophie and Kernebeck, Sven and Dreier, Larissa Alicia and Meyer, Dorothee and Goletz, Grazyna and Zenz, Daniel and Wager, Julia and Ehlers, Jan Peter and Zernikow, Boris},
  title     = {Nutzer*innenzentrierte Entwicklung einer elektronischen Patient*innenakte f{\"u}r die p{\"a}diatrische Palliativversorgung - Ergebnisse von Fokusgruppeninterviews mit Pflegenden im station{\"a}ren Setting.},
  series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Palliativmedizin},
  volume    = {21},
  journal   = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Palliativmedizin},
  number    = {5},
  doi       = {10.1055/s-0040-1714990},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{BusseKernebeckDreieretal.2020,
  author    = {Busse, Theresa Sophie and Kernebeck, Sven and Dreier, Larissa and Meyer, Dorothee and Goletz, Graznya and Zenz, D. and Wager, Julia and Zernikow, Boris and Ehlers, Jan Peter},
  title     = {Nutzung von Mock-ups im Co-Design-Prozess der partizipativen Entwicklung einer station{\"a}ren elektronischen Patient*innenakte f{\"u}r die p{\"a}diatrische Palliativversorgung - ein Erfahrungsbericht},
  series = {19. Deutscher Kongress f{\"u}r Versorgungsforschung, Deutsches Netzwerk f{\"u}r Versorgungsforschung e.V, September 2020, online},
  journal   = {19. Deutscher Kongress f{\"u}r Versorgungsforschung, Deutsches Netzwerk f{\"u}r Versorgungsforschung e.V, September 2020, online},
  doi       = {10.3205/20dkvf117},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {de}
}
@incollection{BusseKernebeckEhlers2023,
  author    = {Busse, Theresa Sophie and Kernebeck, Sven and Ehlers, Jan Peter},
  title     = {Projektbericht - partizipative Entwicklung eines elektronischen Aktensystems- Erfahrungen und {\"U}bertragung auf ePA und ePA-nahe Anwendungen.},
  series = {eHealth Monitor 2022},
  booktitle = {eHealth Monitor 2022},
  isbn      = {978-3-95466-759-8},
  year      = {2023},
  language  = {de}
}
@inproceedings{BusseKernebeckJuxetal.2022,
  author    = {Busse, Theresa Sophie and Kernebeck, Sven and Jux, Chantal and Laser, Johannes and Ehlers, Jan Peter},
  title     = {Einbezug von Versorger:innen in die Entwicklung und Evaluation elektronischer Gesundheitsakten - ein Scoping Review},
  series = {21. Deutscher Kongress f{\"u}r Versorgungsforschung, Deutsches Netzwerk Versorgungsforschung e. V., 05.10. - 07.10.2022, Potsdam},
  booktitle = {21. Deutscher Kongress f{\"u}r Versorgungsforschung, Deutsches Netzwerk Versorgungsforschung e. V., 05.10. - 07.10.2022, Potsdam},
  doi       = {10.3205/22dkvf342},
  year      = {2022},
  language  = {de}
}
@inproceedings{BusseKernebeckMeyeretal.2020,
  author    = {Busse, Theresa Sophie and Kernebeck, Sven and Meyer, Dorothee and Dreier, Larissa and Goletz, Grazyna and Zenz, Daniel and Ehlers, Jan Peter and Wager, Julia and Zernikow, Boris},
  title     = {Verbesserung der Gesundheitsversorgung in der p{\"a}diatrischen Palliativversorgung durch Digitalisierung im partizipativen Entwicklungs- und Forschungsprojekt ELSA-PP zur Entwicklung eines elektronischen sektoren{\"u}bergreifenden Aktensystems},
  series = {19. Deutscher Kongress f{\"u}r Versorgungsforschung, 30.09. - 01.10.2020, digital},
  booktitle = {19. Deutscher Kongress f{\"u}r Versorgungsforschung, 30.09. - 01.10.2020, digital},
  doi       = {10.3205/20dkvf435},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {de}
}
@inproceedings{BusseKernebeckNefetal.2020,
  author    = {Busse, Theresa Sophie and Kernebeck, Sven and Nef, Larissa and Kickbusch, Ilona and Ehlers, Jan P.},
  title     = {Talk to me - Soziale Roboter im Gesundheitswesen.},
  series = {Report Careum Dialog 2020},
  booktitle = {Report Careum Dialog 2020},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{BusseKernebeckNefetal.2021,
  author    = {Busse, Theresa Sophie and Kernebeck, Sven and Nef, Larissa and Rebacz, Patrick and Kickbusch, Ilona and Ehlers, Jan Peter},
  title     = {Views on Using Social Robots in Professional Caregiving: Content Analysis of a Scenario Method Workshop (Preprint)},
  series = {J Med Internet Res},
  volume    = {23},
  journal   = {J Med Internet Res},
  number    = {11},
  doi       = {10.25974/fhms-17307},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:hbz:836-opus-173072},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {BACKGROUND Interest in digital technologies in the health care sector is growing and can be a way to reduce the burden on professional caregivers while helping people to become more independent. Social robots are regarded as a special form of technology that can be usefully applied in professional caregiving with the potential to focus on interpersonal contact. While implementation is progressing slowly, a debate on the concepts and applications of social robots in future care is necessary. OBJECTIVE In addition to existing studies with a focus on societal attitudes toward social robots, there is a need to understand the views of professional caregivers and patients. This study used desired future scenarios to collate the perspectives of experts and analyze the significance for developing the place of social robots in care. METHODS In February 2020, an expert workshop was held with 88 participants (health professionals and educators; [PhD] students of medicine, health care, professional care, and technology; patient advocates; software developers; government representatives; and research fellows) from Austria, Germany, and Switzerland. Using the scenario methodology, the possibilities of analog professional care (Analog Care), fully robotic professional care (Robotic Care), teams of robots and professional caregivers (Deep Care), and professional caregivers supported by robots (Smart Care) were discussed. The scenarios were used as a stimulus for the development of ideas about future professional caregiving. The discussion was evaluated using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS The majority of the experts were in favor of care in which people are supported by technology (Deep Care) and developed similar scenarios with a focus on dignity-centeredness. The discussions then focused on the steps necessary for its implementation, highlighting a strong need for the development of eHealth competence in society, a change in the training of professional caregivers, and cross-sectoral concepts. The experts also saw user acceptance as crucial to the use of robotics. This involves the acceptance of both professional caregivers and care recipients. CONCLUSIONS The literature review and subsequent workshop revealed how decision-making about the value of social robots depends on personal characteristics related to experience and values. There is therefore a strong need to recognize individual perspectives of care before social robots become an integrated part of care in the future.},
  language  = {de}
}